Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday October 27 2015, @05:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-comes-next-anal-probes dept.

According to The Hill a lawsuit argued the agency failed to follow rulemaking procedures on the devices before deploying them.

A federal judge ordered the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) on Friday to quickly finalize a rulemaking procedure for the controversial full-body scanners it uses at airport security checkpoints across the country.

The agency was sued by the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) over the controversial devices in a lawsuit that argued that the TSA did not follow federal procedure for rulemaking when it decided to deploy the scanners, which are known as Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) devices.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on Friday, ordering the TSA to "submit to the court a schedule for the expeditious issuance of a final rule" on the full-body scanners within 30 days.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Tuesday October 27 2015, @10:55PM

    by isostatic (365) on Tuesday October 27 2015, @10:55PM (#255321) Journal

    A locked cockpit door

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @11:28PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 27 2015, @11:28PM (#255335)

    Well, we have that, but does it necessarily relate to the TSA? I'm just wondering where this New TSA comes in.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 28 2015, @10:11AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 28 2015, @10:11AM (#255494)

    Germanwings Flight 9525

    Germanwings Flight 9525

    (The result of which was not outlawing locked doors, but stricter rules for pilots' mental health checks, AND a requirement that there always be two crew members in the cockpit - which in the case a pilot needs to use the bath room will result in someone who is not a pilot - and thus don't get their mental health checked at all - sitting in the pilots seat).

    • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Wednesday October 28 2015, @05:05PM

      by isostatic (365) on Wednesday October 28 2015, @05:05PM (#255697) Journal

      What happens if there's two pilots in the cockpit, and one of them knocks the other one out? The usual over-reaction.

      Helios Flight 522 was more concerning. Both of these events were victims of the reaction after 9/11. Now locking the cockpit door prevents 9/11 style events, but instead causes 9525/522 events. It's a toss up as to which is a better policy.

      So how does the TSA stop this?

      Groping 13 year old girls does not prevent 9/11 or 9525/522.