Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday October 28 2015, @03:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the win-some-lose-some dept.

The BBC reports:

A series of amendments to a regulation on how internet traffic is managed in Europe were all rejected by MEPs.

Proponents of net neutrality, who demand that web traffic be treated equally by networks, have already criticised the move.

The existing legislation, which was accepted, will be developed into regulations.

[...]

Although some campaigners had suggested there might be growing support for the amendments within the parliament, all were voted down in large majorities.

It is thought that many MEPs would have been reluctant to begin a process of amending the regulation given that it might have delayed another aspect of the rules - the abolition of mobile data roaming charges.

Later on they detail the problems of the rules that have been adopted:

Part of the problem with the rules in their current form, argued Joe McNamee at the European Digital Rights campaign group, is that they are ambiguous.

"As the text currently stands there is no indication as to how much abuse of dominance would be permissible under this arrangement," he told the BBC.

The sort of scenarios that could impact internet use include the creation of "fast lanes" and "slow lanes" - traffic prioritised depending on fees paid by content providers - or the creation of "zero ratings" in which some services may be accessed without using up any of the internet user's data quota.

In Belgium, for example, some mobile phone companies currently allow unlimited access to Twitter and Facebook while all other data usage is part of a monthly plan. In a few countries such as the Netherlands, such practices are not allowed.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by sudo rm -rf on Wednesday October 28 2015, @04:55PM

    by sudo rm -rf (2357) on Wednesday October 28 2015, @04:55PM (#255690) Journal

    I also spent already too much time searching for that info, found only one source that far and that is only for German MEPs (Member of the European Parliaments? Shouldn't it be MsEP?)
    The page [sven-giegold.de] is in german, but the result is in pictures.
    Explanation and votes:

    Bündnis 90/Die Grünen = Greens 10Y 0A 0N
    Die Linke = Socialists 7Y 0A 0N
    SPD = Social Democrats 22Y 1A 1N
    CDU/CSU = Christian Democrats 1Y 0A 30N
    FDP = Liberals 3Y 0A 5N
    ALFA = hmmm... something like the US Tea Party Movement? 1Y 1A 5N

    Why is it so hard to find out who voted for what?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 28 2015, @05:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 28 2015, @05:11PM (#255700)

    So the majority of the German EP members voted for the amendments.