Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday October 29 2015, @03:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the need-a-penalty-box dept.

Bruce Schneier's blog talks about the recent hack of CIA director John O. Brennan's AOL account (among others) and says when it comes to social engineering attacks:

The problem is a system that makes this possible, and companies that don't care because they don't suffer the losses. It's a classic market failure, and government intervention is how we have to fix the problem.

It's only when the costs of insecurity exceed the costs of doing it right that companies will invest properly in our security. Companies need to be responsible for the personal information they store about us. They need to secure it better, and they need to suffer penalties if they improperly release it. This means regulatory security standards.

Schneier goes on to suggest the government should establish minimum standards for results and let the market figure out the best way to do it. He also partly blames consumers because they demand any security solutions be easy to use, ending with:

It doesn't have to be this way. We should demand better and more usable security from the companies we do business with and whose services we use online. But because we don't have any real visibility into those companies' security, we should demand our government start regulating the security of these companies as a matter of public safety.

Related: WikiLeaks Publishes CIA Chief's Personal Info


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2015, @08:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 29 2015, @08:23PM (#256214)

    > If people didn't insist on giving companies they shouldn't trust every single details about their real life, they wouldn't be doxxed.

    Yeah? Property records are public information - you want to own a house, you either give up the fact that you own that house, and thus probably live there, or you spend a lot of money to hide it behind shells or trusts.

    Same thing with a lot of utilities - they mandate a SS# so they can run a credit check, even if you want to put up a big deposit. Their records aren't public, but they aren't particularly secure.

    Similarly drivers licenses. Some states won't distribute your info if you opt out, but again their systems are not hacker proof.