Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday October 30 2015, @08:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the and-not-cheap dept.

The US Department of Defense has announced that Northrup Grumman will be supplying its next generation of Long Range Strike Bomber (LRSB) to replace the aging B-52 and B-2 fleets.

"Over the past century, no nation has used air power to accomplish its global reach -- to compress time and space -- like the United States," said Defense Secretary Ash Carter

"Building this bomber is a strategic investment in the next 50 years, and represents our aggressive commitment to a strong and balanced force. It demonstrates our commitment to our allies and our determination to potential adversaries, making it crystal clear that the United States will continue to retain the ability to project power throughout the globe long into the future."

The first prototypes of the new bomber won't take to the skies until 2025 at the earliest, and is unlikely to be operational for years after that. But it's going to be packed with the latest technology to shield it from ever-smarter missiles and other weapons systems.
...
Like the B-2, it will be using radar-absorbing materials and high-tech weapons. Directed-energy anti-missile technology has been touted for the aircraft by some analysts, as has the ability to carry electronic payloads that could disrupt enemy computer systems.

Yes, Ye Children of Slashdot, this one will have frickin' laser beams.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 31 2015, @09:49AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 31 2015, @09:49AM (#256843)

    enough military power to kill everyone just one time

    Across how many thousands of miles of ocean does USA have to project power to accomplish that?

    What exactly did the other guys do to piss off USA?
    Did they conduct an attack inside the territorial waters of the USA or attack one of USA's numerous colonial possessions?

    ...or (more likely) did they say NO to another of USA's overt attempts at hegemony somewhere on the other side of the world?
    Y'know, at one of the more than 800 USA military outposts in 135 countries across the globe.
    ...or was it due to another of USA's numerous covert attempts at regime change.

    The problem with having a standing military (as our 1st president knew all too well) is that you then have to find something for it to do.
    The bigger that standing military is, the greater the temptation to use it.

    -- gewg_

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2