Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday October 31 2015, @02:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the next-up-are-the-nanobiomes dept.

A group of scientists have written into the journals Science and Nature , calling for the creation of U.S. and international microbiome initiatives similar in scale to the Human Brain Project:

The White House is already considering increasing its support of research into the workings of these microbial communities, called microbiomes. The new papers "are very thoughtful and have a lot to tell us," said Jo Handelsman, the associate director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and herself a microbiologist. As to whether there will be a national microbiome initiative, she said, "We don't have anything to announce today."

Microbiomes have become the focus of intense study and public interest. The trillions of microbes that live inside the human body, for example, play important roles in health, from fighting diseases to maintaining a balanced immune system.

[...] As yet, there are few examples of successful manipulation of microbiomes. The best documented is a medical procedure known as fecal transplant. Patients with life-threatening gut infections can be cured by receiving intestinal bacteria from a healthy donor. Yet scientists are still at a loss to explain how individual species of bacteria in such a transplant help battle infections. A fuller understanding might open the way to using microbiome-based treatments for other ailments, from tooth decay to obesity.

Dr. Miller said it might also be possible to tend to microbiomes outside our bodies. Manipulating microbes in farm fields could increase the productivity of crops, for example. The tundra, too, contains vast amounts of methane-generating microbes that could accelerate global warming. Understanding how that microbiome works might lead to ways to control its effects on the climate.

[More after the break.]

[...] Answering the questions will demand new tools to gather and analyze data, Dr. McFall-Ngai said. To understand how microbes behave, for instance, scientists need a better way to see the molecular activity inside them. "We want to pull out individual cells and ask, 'What are they doing?' " Dr. McFall-Ngai said. "We have no methods for that."

In their commentary for Nature, Dr. McFall-Ngai and her co-authors, Nicole Dubilier of the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Germany and Liping Zhao of Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China, urged the United States to coordinate research efforts on microbiomes with other countries. "Earth's biome is not defined by national borders," they wrote.

The Science article discusses the goals of a U.S.-based Unified Microbiome Initiative (UMI) while the Nature article advocates for the creation of an International Microbiome Initiative (IMI) while discussing the limitations of previous efforts. Areas of emphasis for the UMI include "decrypting microbial genes and chemistries, cellular genomics and genome dynamics, high-throughput, high-sensitivity multiomics and visualization, modeling and informatics, and perturbing communities in situ and tractable model systems".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Bobs on Saturday October 31 2015, @04:50PM

    by Bobs (1462) on Saturday October 31 2015, @04:50PM (#256921)

    Sounds like a great idea to me.

    Though some might argue that it would be better to let private industry do it [soylentnews.org] and then own the benefits because profit!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 31 2015, @05:41PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 31 2015, @05:41PM (#256935)

    Too bad the research will be done by a bunch of people who "hate math", dont like replication because "it was done before", and think a significant pvalue means thier theory only capable of predicting A bigger than B is true. Until those problems are addressed, this is Just more jobs program pseudoscience in the pipeline.

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday October 31 2015, @09:00PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday October 31 2015, @09:00PM (#256988) Journal

      If they get 10% of the budget that the Human Brain Project is getting, they can hire a few statisticians.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 31 2015, @09:42PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 31 2015, @09:42PM (#257001)

        When I first started sensing something was wrong during grad school I went to see the statistician. He told me basically: "Yep, everything is messed up. It is impossible to change things here and any stats adviser that doesn't go with the flow gets fired. I've heard it is just as bad everywhere else. So I just tell people to do what is normal in your field, keep my mouth shut, and plug into the stats program for them."