Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday November 01 2015, @10:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the goose-meet-gander dept.

CIA chief John Brennan said Tuesday he was "outraged" that hackers broke into his personal email account, and faulted the media for its coverage of the incident.

WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy group, began releasing documents from Brennan's private AOL account last week, days after a teenage hacker was reported to have claimed he had gained access to the account.

"I was certainly concerned about what people might try to do with that information," he told a conference on national security in Washington, criticizing the media for "giving air to what is criminal activity."

The documents released so far have included a contact list, policy recommendations on Afghanistan and Pakistan, and his family's addresses and phone numbers.

Although an embarrassment, the document dump has not exposed national security secrets, and Brennan appears to have stopped using the account in 2008 when he rejoined the government after a period in private life.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Sunday November 01 2015, @01:15PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday November 01 2015, @01:15PM (#257143) Journal

    Point taken. Better to be violated in private, than in public. Except - government isn't private either. Government does things like secretly putting you on a no-fly list. Government decides that you need to be violated every time you fly. Government has sought to make these invasive searches and interrogations applicable to travel by rail. They would probably like to make them applicable to travel by bus as well. If you resist, government can make you disappear.

    Random hackers? They might embarrass me, they might take my money, but random hackers can't incarcerate me, or send me to a reeducation camp. They can't destroy my professional reputation. They can't take all of my money away.

    But, better to have all this happen in private, than publicly, right?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by Nuke on Sunday November 01 2015, @08:33PM

    by Nuke (3162) on Sunday November 01 2015, @08:33PM (#257248)

    Random hackers? They might embarrass me, they might take my money, but random hackers can't incarcerate me, or send me to a reeducation camp. They can't destroy my professional reputation. They can't take all of my money away. But, better to have all this happen in private, than publicly, right?

    If the random hackers make the stuff about you public, as they love to do to show off their skills, the NSA, CIA etc will pick it up anyway.