Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday November 05 2015, @12:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the debugging? dept.

In a kind of counter intuitive argument in this article in The Wall Street Journal , Uber drivers may now have to battle with the fact that no human is actually telling them what to do. Most of the tasks are now being automated. The study by Researchers at the Data and Society research institute at New York University point out that Uber uses software to exert similar control over workers that a human manager would.

The world looks more and more like the Manna short story, where every aspect of our employee life is used to classify our performance. Another interesting discussion point: Is the middle manager role disappearing?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Friday November 06 2015, @05:12AM

    by mhajicek (51) on Friday November 06 2015, @05:12AM (#259291)

    I think getting people to do what work is needed isn't the hard part, because automation. The hard part is getting those in power to not hoard the results but instead give food and shelter freely to people who don't have any work of value to do.

    --
    The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Murdoc on Friday November 06 2015, @09:49AM

    by Murdoc (2518) on Friday November 06 2015, @09:49AM (#259354)

    Then it's a good thing that in a Technocracy:
    1) There is no power to abuse.
    2) Right to consume is a guaranteed basic right of citizenship.
    3) There is no "private property", making hoarding difficult.
    4) The entire point of Technocracy is "To produce an abundance of goods and services for all citizens for the longest period possible." Thus limiting anyone artificially would be against the point.

    • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Friday November 06 2015, @10:06PM

      by mhajicek (51) on Friday November 06 2015, @10:06PM (#259688)

      And that is why Technocracies only exist in fiction. Someone will have control of the means of production, and therefore have power.

      --
      The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek