SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
In 2011 AMD released the Bulldozer architecture, with a somewhat untraditional implementation of the "multicore" technology. Now, 4 years later, they are sued for false advertising, fraud and other "criminal activities". From TFA:
In claiming that its new Bulldozer CPU had "8-cores," which means it can perform eight calculations simultaneously, AMD allegedly tricked consumers into buying its Bulldozer processors by overstating the number of cores contained in the chips. Dickey alleges the Bulldozer chips functionally have only four cores—not eight, as advertised.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
AMD Sued by Customer Over Misrepresentation of "Multicore"
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 36 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
In Tulsa, Oklahoma, it is against the law to open a soda bottle without
the supervision of a licensed engineer.
(Score: 3, Informative) by frojack on Saturday November 07 2015, @07:03AM
Monitoring programs?
You know how those really work? There is no set rule you know.
Microsoft [microsoft.com] says it just counts passes through their idle routine. Linux does it differently, watching for time when there no tasks waiting to be dispatched.
But none of those methods mean didly squat when processors can be throttled up or down by a simple voltage change.
Percentage of idle time means nothing when the processor is slowed to just a fraction of its clock speed, and a tiny little routine can use all the available cycles because the processor is running so slowly.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.