Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Saturday November 07 2015, @06:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-you-don't-have-something-nice-to-say... dept.

The BBC reports that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will "review" the appointment of his new communications director, Ran Baratz, over comments Baratz made on Facebook accusing President Obama of anti-Semitism and describing US Secretary of State John Kerry as having a "mental age" of no more than 12. Netanyahu has described the comments as totally unacceptable while US state department spokesman John Kirby said Mr Baratz's Facebook posts were "troubling and offensive". "Insults, certainly, aimed at individuals doesn't do anything to help advance and deepen the relationship. ... We learn in kindergarten about name-calling, and it's simply not a polite thing to do, ' Kirby said.

The Facebook posts emerged shortly after Netanyahu announced the appointment of philosophy lecturer Mr Baratz as his chief spokesman. In March, Baratz described President Obama's criticism of Netanyahu's opposition to the Iran nuclear deal as "the modern face of anti-Semitism in Western and liberal countries".

Netanyahu quickly distanced himself from the comments but indicated the appointment remained valid. "I have just read Dr Ran Baratz's posts on the internet, including those relating to the president of the state of Israel, the president of the United States and other public figures in Israel and the United States," Netanyahu said in a statement. "Those posts are totally unacceptable and in no way reflect my positions or the policies of the government of Israel. Dr Baratz has apologized and has asked to meet me to clarify the matter following my return to Israel."

Baratz, in a Facebook post Thursday night, apologized for "the hurtful remarks" and for not informing the prime minister of them. Baratz said the posts "were written frivolously and sometimes humorously, in a tone suited to the social networks and a private individual." Baratz added, "It is very clear to me that in an official post one has to behave and express oneself differently."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by physicsmajor on Saturday November 07 2015, @09:23PM

    by physicsmajor (1471) on Saturday November 07 2015, @09:23PM (#260116)

    Odd, I would have thought someone in charge of communications should be specialized in rather the opposite of keeping their mouth shut.

    In seriousness, while I don't agree with everything in the GP post I do believe it's entirely appropriate to discuss both Kerry and Obama in light of the comments made. That is not off topic, it's very on topic. For example, a discussion about educational standards in Israel vs. the USA may show that an average 12 year old in Israel is about equivalent or superior to Kerry. One could compare vocabulary of public statements, etc. and actually get somewhere with this. In which case the comment becomes accurate, if disparaging, and that's rather relevant.

    In summary, don't silence discourse with a knee-jerk response.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 08 2015, @01:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 08 2015, @01:42AM (#260196)

    > For example, a discussion about educational standards in Israel vs. the USA may show that an average 12 year old in Israel is about equivalent or superior to Kerry.

    lolwut? Just because TFA has the word "kerry" in it doesn't make any rando thing about kerry that you can think of on topic. Otherwise I could say all kinds of bullshit about you because your name was on the post you just made.

    > In summary, don't silence discourse with a knee-jerk response.

    Don't pollute discourse with a knee-jerk response.