SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Dissident Voice reports:
A mass mobilization in Washington, DC from November 14 to 18 has been announced to begin the next stage of the campaign to stop the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
[...] "At its root, the TPP is about modern colonialism. It is the way that Western governments and their transnational corporations, including Wall Street banks, can dominate the economies of developing nations", said Margaret Flowers, co-director of Popular Resistance. She continued "The reality is that without trade justice there cannot be climate justice, food justice; there cannot be health justice or wage justice. That is why people are mobilizing to stop the TPP."
[...] The groups will begin their protests [on Monday morning, November 16] at the US Trade Representative building on 17th Street with the message that the TPP betrays the people, planet, and democracy.
This will be followed that evening by a protest that begins at the US Chamber of Commerce and White House then marches along K Street and ends at the Reagan International Trade Center.
The next day, the groups will have an international focus protesting at multiple sites along Embassy Row to stand in solidarity with people around the world who are fighting to stop the TPP.
On the final day, the groups will focus on Congress.
Previously: Trans-Pacific Partnership Text Released
Trans-Pacific Partnership: "Intellectual Property" Fears Become Reality
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 09 2015, @07:20PM
Due to Poe's law, it is difficult to distinguish between ill-informed opinion and deliberate trolling.
A normal troll test is to check if the poster's argument is self-consistent.
If an argument ignores known facts, that may be because the writer is uninformed, or deliberately spreading FUD. It is hard to tell. If does not help that the "powers that be" are known to use socks to steer discussion or suppress discussion they don't like.
Of course, that last test can get awkward when people from different reference frames meet. What if the "known facts" in an echo-chamber of a community are actually wrong? If you follow the principle of assuming good faith, both parties should try to find a impartial third party they can agree on.