Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Sunday November 08 2015, @10:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the multipass dept.

Elevators haven't changed much in 150 years; the controls got more sophisticated, but they basically remained a box pulled up by a cable, with one cab per shaft. This becomes a real problem as buildings get taller; the multiple shafts end up taking up a lot of valuable real estate, with only one little box in each. The cables get so heavy that you end up spending more energy moving cables than cab. As the buildings sway, the cables start swaying too. The elevators end up being a real limiting factor on the height of our buildings and the density of our cities, and a big factor in the high cost of high buildings.
...
Last year, ThyssenKrupp announced a solution to this problem: the MULTI lift system which gets rid of elevator cables, and instead runs each elevator cab as an independent vehicle on a vertical track, powered by linear induction motors. Because there were no cables, it meant that they could put more than one car in every shaft. In fact, they could put a continuous stream of them in.
...
And move it does, in the most remarkable ways, unlike any elevator ever built. The cabs rise up on the tracks, powered by the linear induction motors; when they reach the end, top, bottom or any point where they want to move sideways, a section of track rotates and the cab goes sideways.

Two words: motion sickness.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 09 2015, @07:56AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 09 2015, @07:56AM (#260687)

    Read the article, the thing doesn't exist except for a tiny prototype. There's no safety controls or emergency breaks, they haven't figured out how to keep one car from running into another, it'll be insanely expensive, there's only room for a couple people at a time (so if you're in a group of lets say 3 people with luggage you'll need to split up), etc...

  • (Score: 2) by Nuke on Monday November 09 2015, @11:43AM

    by Nuke (3162) on Monday November 09 2015, @11:43AM (#260725)

    There's no safety controls or emergency breaks [brakes?]

    But there is nothing that could possibly go wrong.

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 09 2015, @03:55PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 09 2015, @03:55PM (#260803) Journal

    There's no safety controls or emergency breaks, they haven't figured out how to keep one car from running into another

    Well, naturally, you would expect those things to be developed after the prototype is proven.

    it'll be insanely expensive

    These things aren't for the homebuilder on a budget. If you're building a km or taller building, then you have a little bigger budget for these things.

    there's only room for a couple people at a time (so if you're in a group of lets say 3 people with luggage you'll need to split up)

    Unless they're made bigger.

    Sure, this may well be vaporware, but your reasons are rather weak.

  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Osamabobama on Monday November 09 2015, @07:29PM

    by Osamabobama (5842) on Monday November 09 2015, @07:29PM (#260875)

    Disney's Tower of Terror would be a good model; it goes up, down, and sideways. It also has some safety features that prevent rapid deceleration after a fall, for sufficiently large values of 'rapid'.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.