Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday November 10 2015, @02:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the which-way-tot-he-chicken-coop dept.

Jim Balsillie of BlackBerry fame has come out against the TPP.

From the CBC article:

Jim Balsillie warns that provisions tucked into the Trans-Pacific Partnership could cost Canada hundreds of billions of dollars — and eventually make signing it the worst public policy decision in the country's history.

After poring over the treaty's final text, the businessman who helped build Research In Motion into a $20-billion global player said the deal contains "troubling" rules on intellectual property that threaten to make Canada a "permanent underclass" in the economy of selling ideas.

...

And unlike legislation passed in Parliament, he noted treaties like this one set rules that must be followed forever. This deal, he added, also features "iron-clad" dispute mechanisms.

"I'm worried and I don't know how we can get out of this," said Balsillie, who's also helping guide the creation of a lobby group that would press for the needs of Canada's innovation sector.

"I think our trade negotiators have profoundly failed Canadians and our future innovators. I really lament it."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by SubiculumHammer on Tuesday November 10 2015, @03:42PM

    by SubiculumHammer (5191) on Tuesday November 10 2015, @03:42PM (#261296)

    When does this come up for a vote?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 10 2015, @04:06PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 10 2015, @04:06PM (#261306)

    It doesn't. Welcome to modern democracy.

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 11 2015, @01:30AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 11 2015, @01:30AM (#261526)

    I've seen|heard several things that say they won't get serious about this until Spring 2016.

    We should also note here that this is actually a treaty.
    The Constitution says that THE HOUSE of Representatives HAS NO ROLE in ratifying treaties.

    The Constitution says that a 2/3 majority of the Senate is required to approve a treaty.

    This a-simple-majority-of-both-houses to get this approved is unconstitutional bullshit.

    -- gewg_