Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday November 13 2015, @10:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-only-half-a-Tau dept.

While most people associate the mathematical constant π (pi) with arcs and circles, mathematicians are accustomed to seeing it in a variety of fields. But two University scientists were still surprised to find it lurking in a quantum mechanics formula for the energy states of the hydrogen atom.

"We didn't just find pi," said Tamar Friedmann, a visiting assistant professor of mathematics and a research associate of high energy physics, and co-author of a paper published this week in the Journal of Mathematical Physics. "We found the classic seventeeth century Wallis formula for pi, making us the first to derive it from physics, in general, and quantum mechanics, in particular."

The Wallis formula—developed by British mathematician John Wallis in his book Arithmetica Infinitorum—defines π as the product of an infinite string of ratios made up of integers. For Friedmann, discovering the Wallis formula for π in a quantum mechanics formula for the hydrogen atom's energy states underscores π's omnipresence in math and science.

"The value of pi has taken on a mythical status, in part, because it's impossible to write it down with 100 percent accuracy," said Friedmann, "It cannot even be accurately expressed as a ratio of integers, and is, instead, best represented as a formula."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Friday November 13 2015, @10:28PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Friday November 13 2015, @10:28PM (#262861) Journal

    "The value of pi has taken on a mythical status, in part, because it's impossible to write it down with 100 percent accuracy," said Friedmann, "It cannot even be accurately expressed as a ratio of integers, and is, instead, best represented as a formula."

    That's true for any irrational number. Square root of two, cube root of five, golden mean, Euler constant, ...

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by vux984 on Friday November 13 2015, @10:40PM

    by vux984 (5045) on Friday November 13 2015, @10:40PM (#262862)

    It cannot even be accurately expressed as a ratio of integers

    That's true for any irrational number.

    Actually that is the DEFINITION of a irrational number. That it can't be expressed as a ratio. That's literally what it means irrRATIOnal -> not-ratio-able aka "not expressible as a ratio"

    However, I do think Pi is still more special than root2 or euler's constant just given how ubiquitous it and how many seemingly (emphasis on seemingly) unrelated ways there are to arrive at it.

    • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 13 2015, @10:41PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 13 2015, @10:41PM (#262864)

      > the DEFINITION of a irrational number

      Actually they named it after my ex-wife.

    • (Score: 2) by jdavidb on Friday November 13 2015, @11:27PM

      by jdavidb (5690) on Friday November 13 2015, @11:27PM (#262877) Homepage Journal

      Actually that is the DEFINITION of a irrational number. That it can't be expressed as a ratio. That's literally what it means irrRATIOnal -> not-ratio-able aka "not expressible as a ratio"

      Yes, but π has emotional issues and makes bad decisions.

      --
      ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
    • (Score: 1) by korger on Saturday November 14 2015, @07:47PM

      by korger (4465) on Saturday November 14 2015, @07:47PM (#263419)

      However, I do think Pi is still more special than root2 or euler's constant just given how ubiquitous it and how many seemingly (emphasis on seemingly) unrelated ways there are to arrive at it.

      Actually, pi and e are closely related, as expressed by the formula e^(pi*i)+1 = 0. There's an intrinsic beauty in this equation, which combines the five most important mathematical constants (0, 1, i, pi, e) into a single expression. As such, I'd reason that neither of these numbers is more special than the others, at least in the field of complex numbers.