Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday November 14 2015, @12:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the double-screw-up dept.

Vice News reports:

Chemical dispersants were supposed to make it easier for undersea bacteria to digest the oil that poured into the Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater Horizon blowout.

But scientists who've been studying the aftermath of the 2010 disaster now say the controversial chemicals were a bust: Instead of eating the dispersed hydrocarbons, oil-munching microbes appear uninterested when crude and dispersants are mixed together.

A type of bacteria that normally would be first in line at the hydrocarbon buffet — and which surged when exposed to oil alone — "clearly declined in the presence of dispersants," a new study found. And another microbe actually ate the dispersants, University of Georgia oceanographer Samantha Joye said.

"Instead of making a community that was more efficient at oil degradation, the dispersant created a community that was really efficient at degrading dispersant, but not very efficient at degrading oil," said Joye, who leads a research group examining the effects of the oil spill on the Gulf.

The latest research by Joye and her colleagues was published this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a leading peer-reviewed scientific journal. The authors recommend moving cautiously before spraying dispersants — which are toxic on their own, and appear to be more toxic when combined with oil — onto the next spill.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Gravis on Saturday November 14 2015, @01:15PM

    by Gravis (4596) on Saturday November 14 2015, @01:15PM (#263221)

    it seems like we have more than ample reasons to stop using oil and even more to stop deep sea drilling.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by ledow on Saturday November 14 2015, @01:22PM

    by ledow (5567) on Saturday November 14 2015, @01:22PM (#263224) Homepage

    Unfortunately for you the price of oil is dropping rapidly and we have a huge surplus.

    So, for the meantime at least, it's going to get used more, not less.

    • (Score: 2) by M. Baranczak on Saturday November 14 2015, @01:35PM

      by M. Baranczak (1673) on Saturday November 14 2015, @01:35PM (#263237)
      The good news is, the low oil prices are putting the kibosh on new exploration. The bad news is, the low oil prices won't last.
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Saturday November 14 2015, @03:25PM

    by Bot (3902) on Saturday November 14 2015, @03:25PM (#263276) Journal

    To be honest, my inference engine notices a missing option: drilling the oil execs.

    Vote skynet 2024!

    --
    Account abandoned.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday November 15 2015, @06:51AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday November 15 2015, @06:51AM (#263583) Journal

    it seems like we have more than ample reasons to stop using oil and even more to stop deep sea drilling.

    And use what instead? I don't exactly agree with the peak oil people, but they do have a good point about certain things. If you run up the cost of transportation and energy delivery frivolously or not, you will create massive economic problems.

    Second, what is the actual harm supposed to be here? Dispersants don't supposedly just make oil more easily consumed by microbes, they also supposedly make it less bioreactive (that is, provide some degree of isolation of the compounds of oil so that it poisons organisms to a lesser degree), which if you think about it is a contrary purpose to the first. So it's not clear to me that there is an actual problem here, but rather an already known trade off between biodegradation and bioreactivity.