Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Saturday November 14 2015, @12:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the double-screw-up dept.

Vice News reports:

Chemical dispersants were supposed to make it easier for undersea bacteria to digest the oil that poured into the Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater Horizon blowout.

But scientists who've been studying the aftermath of the 2010 disaster now say the controversial chemicals were a bust: Instead of eating the dispersed hydrocarbons, oil-munching microbes appear uninterested when crude and dispersants are mixed together.

A type of bacteria that normally would be first in line at the hydrocarbon buffet — and which surged when exposed to oil alone — "clearly declined in the presence of dispersants," a new study found. And another microbe actually ate the dispersants, University of Georgia oceanographer Samantha Joye said.

"Instead of making a community that was more efficient at oil degradation, the dispersant created a community that was really efficient at degrading dispersant, but not very efficient at degrading oil," said Joye, who leads a research group examining the effects of the oil spill on the Gulf.

The latest research by Joye and her colleagues was published this week in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a leading peer-reviewed scientific journal. The authors recommend moving cautiously before spraying dispersants — which are toxic on their own, and appear to be more toxic when combined with oil — onto the next spill.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 14 2015, @08:22PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 14 2015, @08:22PM (#263437)

    Instead of making a community that was more efficient at oil degradation, the dispersant created a community that was really efficient at degrading dispersant, but not very efficient at degrading oil

    I didn't know Corexit is biodegradable. I'm no biologist, but just going by the quote above, after the Corexit is consumed, wouldn't there then be droplets of petroleum that would nourish the organisms that eat hydrocarbons? After a fire, small plants like grasses initially make up most of the biomass, and later on, trees may replace them. I can imagine a process of succession taking place in these oil droplets, too. It'd be great, if the addition of the dispersion only caused a delay and didn't outright prevent the oil from being consumed.