Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday November 14 2015, @04:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the coin-flip dept.

The Bern Report reports

Dr. Rick Hardy and Dr. John Hemingway have been leading Mock Presidential Elections [at Western Illinois University] since 1975. During that time, students who have participated in these mock elections have chosen the winning party with 100% accuracy and have an astonishing record in selecting presidential winners.

On the Democratic side for the Primaries Sanders won[1] by close to a 2 to 1 margin over challenger Hillary Clinton.

[...] After nominating Sanders, the student Democrats put him up against Jeb Bush, who received the Republican nomination, with Bernie winning the electoral college by nearly a 4 to 1 margin and a decisive win for the popular vote.

This simulation always takes place the year before the presidential election year, and three months before the actual Iowa caucuses. The genesis of this mock presidential election began at the University of Iowa in 1975 with two political science doctoral students, John Hemingway and Rick Hardy. In that year, students selected Jimmy Carter over Gerald Ford--long before anyone really knew of Jimmy Carter.

In the years that followed, Rick Hardy expanded the format and engaged thousands of students at the University of Missouri-Columbia where students registered a perfect record of selecting the subsequent winning presidential party. In 2007 and 2011, Hardy and Hemingway teamed up again to conduct a massive campus-wide simulation at Western Illinois University. In 2007, Western students selected Barack Obama as president at a time when no one thought he could win! And, in 2011, students narrowly re-elected President Obama.

[1] Content is behind scripts.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Sunday November 15 2015, @01:54PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Sunday November 15 2015, @01:54PM (#263641) Journal

    Hillary seems too close to Wall Street and big corporations. She could conceivably feel that she no longer needs their support once elected, and turn "traitor" and become a people's president, but I doubt it.

    You are right to doubt it. The Clintons are grifters. Everything they do is about the swindle. The lipservice they pay to helping people is simply their schtick, their scheme. Check into how much money they got people to donate to earthquake relief in Haiti and how much money they actually spent helping anyone there.

    They're also wildly incompetent. They know how to do literally not one practical thing.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 16 2015, @06:00AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 16 2015, @06:00AM (#263867)

    > Check into how much money they got people to donate to earthquake relief in Haiti and how much money they actually spent helping anyone there.

    You know no one is going to do that. Who really cares enough about random unsupported invective to go out and prove your point for you?

    Flames like yours just produce the opposite effect -- the internet is full of loud-mouth idiots who are usually wrong. Why would you be any different?