Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Sunday November 15 2015, @10:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the spreading-the-dna dept.

During the Inca civilization, which thrived in South America before the arrival of Europeans, these ritual sacrifices were known as "capococha." One of the victims was a 7-year-old boy who lived more than 500 years ago. His frozen, mummified remains were discovered at the edge of Argentina's Aconcagua, the tallest mountain outside of Asia.

Hikers found the mummy in 1985. Now, 30 years later, scientists have sequenced some of the boy's DNA and used it to learn more about the rise and extent of the Inca Empire. Their findings were published Thursday in the journal Scientific Reports.
...
Those results placed the boy "perfectly" within a genetic population, or haplogroup, known as C1b that is typical of Native Americans, the study authors reported. Previous research has established that one of the people who first populated the Americas brought this genetic signature from Beringia (the land mass that once connected Siberia and Alaska) or the northern tip of North America.

However, the boy's mitochondrial genome had 10 distinct mutations that had not been seen together before in either ancient or modern DNA. The researchers named this branch of the haplotype "C1bi" (the "i" stands for Inca). The fact that his genetic signature was unique offers further evidence that the DNA sample wasn't contaminated, the researchers wrote.

Some of those 10 mutations are or were shared by others, and the researchers used that information to make some educated guesses about the boy's life and times. Most likely, his ancestors had been in South America for a long time, originating near the Andes about 14,000 years ago, they wrote.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Sunday November 15 2015, @08:14PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Sunday November 15 2015, @08:14PM (#263747) Journal

    There's nothing inconsistent with being a peaceful culture living in harmony with nature and human sacrifice. If you want to live in harmony with nature, you've got to control the population somehow.

    Mind you, anyone who thinks the Inca were either peaceful or matriarchal hasn't studied them. OTOH, the evidence for ANY matriarchal cultures is quite slim. Matrilineal, yes. That just means it was assumed that you couldn't be sure who the father of a kid was, but you could be sure your sister's kid was your relative. In matrilineal cultures uncles tend to be more significant than presumptive fathers, and sex tends to be loosely controlled. Patrilineal cultures, OTOH, tend to lock up the women. (I'm describing extremes here to make the distinction obvious. Most cultures are somewhere in between.)

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2