Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday November 18 2015, @06:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the how-will-we-find-the-newest-ED-drugs dept.

AP reports that the American Medical Association has called for a ban on direct-to-consumer ads for prescription drugs and implantable medical devices, saying they contribute to rising costs and patients' demands for inappropriate treatment. According to data cited in an AMA news release, ad dollars spent by drugmakers have risen to $4.5 billion in the last two years, a 30 percent increase. Physicians cited concerns that a growing proliferation of ads is driving demand for expensive treatments despite the clinical effectiveness of less costly alternatives. "Today's vote in support of an advertising ban reflects concerns among physicians about the negative impact of commercially-driven promotions, and the role that marketing costs play in fueling escalating drug prices," said AMA Board Chair-elect Patrice A. Harris, M.D., M.A. "Direct-to-consumer advertising also inflates demand for new and more expensive drugs, even when these drugs may not be appropriate."

The AMA also calls for convening a physician task force and launching an advocacy campaign to promote prescription drug affordability by demanding choice and competition in the pharmaceutical industry, and greater transparency in prescription drug prices and costs. Last month, the Kaiser Family Foundation released a report saying that a high cost of prescription drugs remains the public's top health care priority. In the past few years, prices on generic and brand-name prescription drugs have steadily risen and experienced a 4.7 percent spike in 2015, according to the Altarum Institute Center for Sustainable Health Spending.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by frojack on Wednesday November 18 2015, @08:24PM

    by frojack (1554) on Wednesday November 18 2015, @08:24PM (#265054) Journal

    placebos have become measurably more effective in the USA (but not Europe)

    Very interesting. However, a Citation would be helpful.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=2, Underrated=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 18 2015, @08:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 18 2015, @08:35PM (#265063)

    Lick my taint, dog fucker.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by Hawkwind on Wednesday November 18 2015, @09:11PM

    by Hawkwind (3531) on Wednesday November 18 2015, @09:11PM (#265089)
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by FatPhil on Thursday November 19 2015, @12:39AM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday November 19 2015, @12:39AM (#265160) Homepage
    https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?sid=10019&cid=248502#commentwrap

    OK, that's not a link to the paper, that's a link to you commenting on the story about the research when it was presented here.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves