Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday November 19 2015, @10:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the price-of-freedom dept.

In 2012 John Brennan protested the TSA by stripping nude in an Oregon airport, his actions were ruled a fully legal protest under Oregon law. Despite that ruling, the TSA insists on fining him $500.

Brennan is appealing the fine to the 9th circuit court with the intent of putting the TSA's often extra-legal administrative decisions under constitutional scrutiny. It's going to cost him $15,000. So far he's raised $9,000 with 3 more days to go.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 19 2015, @05:01PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 19 2015, @05:01PM (#265397)

    Is the airport under state or federal jurisdiction? Is it constitutional for the federal government to extend its jurisdiction to the area of the airport where the protest occurred?

    By what authority is the TSA allowed to impose fines upon members of the public? Was there a public trial? How is this constitutional?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Anal Pumpernickel on Thursday November 19 2015, @05:16PM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Thursday November 19 2015, @05:16PM (#265409)

    Well, the TSA is unconstitutional, as government thugs searching people before they're allowed on a plane violates the constitution. So I don't think they care about the constitutional aspect all that much.