Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Thursday November 19 2015, @10:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the price-of-freedom dept.

In 2012 John Brennan protested the TSA by stripping nude in an Oregon airport, his actions were ruled a fully legal protest under Oregon law. Despite that ruling, the TSA insists on fining him $500.

Brennan is appealing the fine to the 9th circuit court with the intent of putting the TSA's often extra-legal administrative decisions under constitutional scrutiny. It's going to cost him $15,000. So far he's raised $9,000 with 3 more days to go.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Thursday November 19 2015, @09:51PM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Thursday November 19 2015, @09:51PM (#265522)

    It's not indecent exposure, but that doesn't mean it can't violate other laws and therefore the TSA can still fine him.

    What laws did he break, specifically? Even if he *did* break some law, getting naked should not be against the law. Neither should causing a "disruption" at an airport while protesting government thugs violating your constitutional rights.

    The TSA has no grounds to fine anyone; it doesn't have any legitimate authority whatsoever. It sounds like this treacherous organization is trying to fine someone without due process to me.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2