Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday November 19 2015, @11:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the call-the-wah-mbulance dept.

Owners of New York City's taxi "medallions" filed a lawsuit (PDF) against city regulators today, saying their business has been devastated by the decision to allow companies like Uber to compete using "E-hail" services.

A medallion is required to operate a New York City yellow taxicab, the only type of vehicle allowed to accept passengers who hail cabs on the street. Until recently, those medallions could sell for over $1 million. Companies like White & Blue Group, one of the plaintiffs in the case, managed fleets of licensed taxicabs by leasing out the medallions.

According to the suit, White & Blue Group, which manages the largest fleet of leased taxicabs in New York, "has seen its monthly leasing income drop as much as 50% in the past year," and has been forced to idle as much as 20 percent of its fleet each day. The complaint was filed today and reported earlier by Reuters.

Extortionists crying about losing money is about the saddest sight in the world.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Friday November 20 2015, @12:30AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday November 20 2015, @12:30AM (#265575) Journal

    Are Uber drivers with app-using customers and customer ratings more or less likely to be killed than cabbies?

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Disagree=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Friday November 20 2015, @12:41AM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday November 20 2015, @12:41AM (#265580)

    >Are Uber drivers with app-using customers and customer ratings more or less likely to be killed than cabbies?

    Unknown, and that's what bothers people. Personally, I'd feel almost as safe stepping into an Uber or Lyft car today (with my cellphone) as I used to feel getting into licensed cabs back in the day before cellphones. Cabs haven't really improved since then, but overall - you're a hell of a lot safer with people who know you can phone for help, leave service ratings that matter (ever try to complain about a cab driver via those "Am I an asshole? call this number:" numbers?), etc.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by frojack on Friday November 20 2015, @02:16AM

      by frojack (1554) on Friday November 20 2015, @02:16AM (#265614) Journal

      So all the city need do is tell the cab companies to go ahead and use an app for dispatching. Problem solved?
      The Technology of medallions was set up to build trust in the taxi system, which NYC desperately needs.
      The new technology puts more control in the hands of the customer.
      The new technology isn't fully proven yet.
      So let the cab companies use BOTH technologies for a while.

      Their complaint is valid because NYC sold them a limited license, took the money, then allows others to do the same job
      without restrictions and without licenses.

      Yes, they had a monopoly (and still do to some extent). and Yes the promises made by the City are not being met.
      You can argue that those promises, and those medallions should have never been issued.
      And you can argue that the taxi industry was a willing participant in this monopoly scheme.
      You can berate them for their insistence on antiquated dispatching methods, their regulated rates, and all the other things they do to prevent actual competition from taking place.

      They had a good run. But its all crashing down. And its hard to blame ONLY the City or ONLY the medallion holders.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 2) by captain normal on Friday November 20 2015, @02:47AM

        by captain normal (2205) on Friday November 20 2015, @02:47AM (#265624)

        Not quite the same. The "medallions" allowed the taxi fleets to cruise the streets and pick up people hailing a cab. All fine if you were in an area where a taxi could be found. If you called for a cab you could wait up to an hour before one showed.
        Uber can't pick up random people off the streets. But if you use the app, you should have a ride within 15 min.
        So not quite the same job. Still I would think big city cab companies likely rank only slightly behind the cable companies in customer dissatisfaction.

        --
        Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts"- --Daniel Patrick Moynihan--
        • (Score: 4, Informative) by frojack on Friday November 20 2015, @03:28AM

          by frojack (1554) on Friday November 20 2015, @03:28AM (#265634) Journal

          So not quite the same job.

          Well, what I meant was..
          Originally the medallions were to protect the public from robbers posing as taxi drivrs.
          Secondary feature was to limit competition, but that came later once the cabbies captured the regulators.

          Uber apps with driver ratings have the same purpose, to give some level of knowledge to the customer so they could avoid assholes.

          Lately, the protection function of the medallion has become secondary to the competition limiting function.

          --
          No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
          • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday November 20 2015, @04:49AM

            by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday November 20 2015, @04:49AM (#265659)

            I don't think the "protection from robbers" ever was much of a factor, if you can procure a big yellow car - how hard would it be to forge a medallion? And, robbers in NYC have many many other ways to get at people besides tricking them into a cab.

            --
            🌻🌻 [google.com]
            • (Score: 4, Interesting) by NCommander on Friday November 20 2015, @05:15AM

              by NCommander (2) Subscriber Badge <michael@casadevall.pro> on Friday November 20 2015, @05:15AM (#265672) Homepage Journal

              To be fair: Taxis have to have the medallion physically present on the hood, have their cab numbers visibly mounted on the roof and doors, *and* require special Taxi license plates. You might be able to forge all of the above, but all it takes is one NYPD officer checking the plate to get busted. Airports also log in cab drivers and out to prevent fakes from getting in queue.

              While I think the medallion system is rigged by preventing competition, it does prevent you from getting hijacked by fake cabs or those who would abuse the meter and such (a common practice I've seen and/or experienced in other cities and countries).

              --
              Still always moving
              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2015, @01:20PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2015, @01:20PM (#265783)

                Throughout a trip in India, I just tracked the route with GPS and maps before and as we were driving (none of the meters were off). I'm not sure how much people have to worry about meter abuse these days, especially in the US.

      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Friday November 20 2015, @04:47AM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday November 20 2015, @04:47AM (#265654)

        Medallions were set up to prevent overcrowding of the roads - and in the process they created a market of scarcity, which is what drove the value so high.

        --
        🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2015, @01:02AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2015, @01:02AM (#265589)

    It's the public's safety from the drivers, not the drivers' safety.

    And the fact that there are star-ratings doesn't impact that at all. Because those are always reactionary. It's similar to why we require auto insurance.

  • (Score: 2, Disagree) by jasassin on Friday November 20 2015, @02:08AM

    by jasassin (3566) <jasassin@gmail.com> on Friday November 20 2015, @02:08AM (#265612) Homepage Journal

    Takyon asks a question and gets modded disagree. How in the fuck can you disagree with a question? Some dumbfuck taxi driver mod this shit or what?

    Sorry, dumbest mod I've seen in a long time. Modding up just because this is fucked.

    --
    jasassin@gmail.com GPG Key ID: 0xE6462C68A9A3DB5A
    • (Score: 3, Disagree) by frojack on Friday November 20 2015, @02:19AM

      by frojack (1554) on Friday November 20 2015, @02:19AM (#265615) Journal

      There are a LOT of modding violations happening lately.
      Disagree is the least of them.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday November 20 2015, @11:21AM

        by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Friday November 20 2015, @11:21AM (#265762) Homepage Journal

        Yeah, I noticed a few of them. Aside from Spam abuse and mod-bombs though, that's up to the people who have integrity to correct with their own mod points. That's why so many of them get given out every day. Beats the hell out of us staff types deciding whose opinions carry more weight.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday November 20 2015, @11:23AM

        by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Friday November 20 2015, @11:23AM (#265763) Homepage Journal

        Oh and Disagree doesn't adjust the score. It's a +0 mod. Just makes it more likely that Disagree will show up as the reason for the score.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2015, @06:44AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 20 2015, @06:44AM (#265690)

    Dead men write no bad reviews.