Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday November 25 2015, @04:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the upstart dept.

TIME Magazine reports:

With eleven days left to go before TIME's 2015 Person of the Year poll[1] come to a close, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, the upstart candidate for president, holds a wide lead over global notables among TIME readers even as he trails Hillary Clinton in voter polls and fights a long-shot battle for the Democratic nomination.

The self-described "democratic socialist" currently leads Malala Yousafzai, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning activist, with 11% in the TIME reader poll compared with her 5%. Sanders also leads Pope Francis and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Barack Obama and is far ahead of entertainers like Adele (2%) and Jennifer Lawrence (1.7%).

[...] Hillary Clinton has earned 1.3 % of the vote.

[...] Sanders is also beating Donald Trump in the reader poll.

[...] Voting on the reader's choice poll ends Dec. 4 at 11:59 p.m. and the winner will be announced Dec 7.

[1] JavaScript-driven

While TIME says that Hillary's popularity in national voter polls is still higher than Bernie's, they fail to mention that Hillary's numbers are slipping while Bernie's numbers continue to climb.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 25 2015, @01:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 25 2015, @01:48PM (#267984)

    That used to be the case, but that hasn't been true since 2001. When it was being floated that Bin Laden was being considered that year, the conservative right made a shitstorm over it which turned into bad PR, and in the end they gave it to Bush. They tried to put a positive spin on it, but it was made very clear that you cannot consider any "bad" people any more, and they've stuck to that.

    I'm too lazy to google it for you, but I think they even re-worded the criteria after that to give themselves a bigger loophole to go through so that they wouldn't end up in such an embarrassing situation again.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 25 2015, @02:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 25 2015, @02:11PM (#267992)

    Well they gave it to Putin in 2007 and I doubt it was because he's such a great guy.