Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday November 26 2015, @01:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the Xenu dept.

An Anonymous Coward submitted the news that a Court ruled Church of Scientology Moscow branch should be 'dissolved':

A Russian court has ruled that the Moscow branch of the Church of Scientology should be dissolved.

The Moscow city court accepted the arguments of Russia's justice ministry that as the term "Scientology" is a registered US trademark, the Church cannot be considered a religious organisation.

The organisation plans to appeal, reports said.

The controversial church is based in Los Angeles, California and was found in 1954 by science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by wisnoskij on Thursday November 26 2015, @02:13AM

    by wisnoskij (5149) <reversethis-{moc ... ksonsiwnohtanoj}> on Thursday November 26 2015, @02:13AM (#268210)

    Well the Catholic Church existed for thousands of years where church law was secular law. And an excommunication carried with it a death penalty. They were able to build a powerbase with this. I do not think it is unfair to allow Scientology to protect their name like any other business. The Catholic church would certainly file for a trademark if it was just starting out.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by SpockLogic on Thursday November 26 2015, @02:53AM

    by SpockLogic (2762) on Thursday November 26 2015, @02:53AM (#268222)

    Good for the Ruskies. They've done something right at last.

    Personally I lean towards Pastafarianism, the more pasta the less lean I get.

    --
    Overreacting is one thing, sticking your head up your ass hoping the problem goes away is another - edIII
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Thursday November 26 2015, @06:29AM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Thursday November 26 2015, @06:29AM (#268249) Journal

      As a Pastafarian I am torn:
       
      On the one hand we have a fictional universal leader of non-human origin; who populates the earth with people; and eventually sets into motion a global catastrophic event (with explosions!).
       
      On the other hand, we've got a guy named Xenu.

    • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday November 26 2015, @12:29PM

      by Thexalon (636) on Thursday November 26 2015, @12:29PM (#268295)

      Alternately, if they used auditing process R2-45 on somebody who actually deserves it like, say, Vladimir Putin or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, then it will be the Scientologists who finally did something right for a change.

      --
      The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 26 2015, @08:23AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 26 2015, @08:23AM (#268263)

    I do not think it is unfair to allow Scientology to protect their name like any other business.

    Nobody said they weren't allowed to. The court said that if you protect your name like any other business, you get to follow the same rules as any other business, instead of the (much more lenient) rules of religion.

    Those rules may include having a valid business license, false advertising (like claiming that you are a religion), etc.