Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday November 27 2015, @03:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the my-vacuum-has-a-bag-not-a-tube dept.

More than a half century later, traveling-wave-tube amplifiers still dominate satellite communication. That's right—your ultrahigh-definition satellite TV and satellite radio come to you courtesy of vacuum tubes in space.

Of course, there's a huge difference between Telstar's 3.5-watt, 4-gigahertz amplifier and one of the dozens of highly efficient microwave amplifiers on, say, the DirecTV-15 satellite, launched earlier this year. The latest generation of traveling-wave tubes can provide up to 180 W at frequencies up to 22 GHz, with efficiencies approaching 70 percent and rated lifetimes exceeding 15 years. Though their basic function is the same—amplifying RF signals—just about everything else has changed: the design, the testing, the materials, and the fabrication.
...
And now, ongoing research into a new and potentially revolutionary kind of traveling-wave tube—the ultracompact and ultraefficient cold-cathode TWT—looks poised to deliver the first practical device by the end of this decade. These are exciting times for vacuum tubes. Here's why.

No cheating this time--read the article to find out why.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Friday November 27 2015, @04:56PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Friday November 27 2015, @04:56PM (#268713) Journal

    http://news.sciencemag.org/physics/2012/05/return-vacuum-tube [sciencemag.org]

    Throw those transistors away!

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 27 2015, @09:38PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 27 2015, @09:38PM (#268814)

    SciMag has decent content but their page construction needs work.
    They could start with the Skip to main content link--which is completely broken.

    .
    Their page doesn't mention the Nuvistor. [wikipedia.org]
    That considerably shrank the size of tubes. [g3ynh.info]
    I remember encountering those in the tuners of RCA TVs in the 1960s.

    .
    The other big downside of a tube is the percentage of the energy those use to light the filament.
    These cold-cathode things are a giant step in the right direction there.

    -- gewg_