Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Wednesday December 02 2015, @01:58AM   Printer-friendly
from the boilering-up dept.

Danielle Douglas-Gabriel writes in the Washington Post that Purdue University is partnering with Vemo Education, a Reston-based financial services firm, to create income-share agreements, or ISAs, that its students can tap to pay for tuition, room and board. In return, students would pay a percentage of their earnings after graduation for a set number of years, replenishing the fund for future investments.

Purdue president Mitch Daniels calls the contracts a constructive addition to today’s government loan programs and perhaps the only option for students and families who have low credit ratings and extra financial need. "From the student’s standpoint, ISAs assure a manageable payback amount, never more than the agreed portion of their incomes. Best of all, they shift the risk of career shortcomings from student to investor: If the graduate earns less than expected, it is the investors who are disappointed; if the student decides to go off to find himself in Nepal instead of working, the loss is entirely on the funding providers, who will presumably price that risk accordingly when offering their terms. This is true “debt-free” college."

However some observers worry that students pursuing profitable degrees in engineering or business would get better repayment terms than those studying to become nurses or teachers. "Income share agreements have the potential to create another option for students looking to pay for college while seeking assurances they will not be overwhelmed by future payments," says Robert Kelchen. "However, given the current generosity of federal income-based repayment programs and the likely hesitation of those who expect six-figure salaries to sign away a percentage of their income for years to come, the market for these programs may be somewhat limited."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @04:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @04:27AM (#270494)

    I for one have been paying income based student loan payments for a few years now. That is government loan based repayment and one of the few options available to students taking out loans. How is this income contingent plan different from the pre-existing income contingent repayment plan?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @02:59PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 02 2015, @02:59PM (#270690)

    Are you not from the US, because this is unheard of in the US.

  • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday December 02 2015, @05:49PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Wednesday December 02 2015, @05:49PM (#270810) Journal

    I think the difference is that you have to repay a fixed amount. The income contingent plan takes a fixed amount of whatever your income is for the term. So, what they get re-payed could be more, or less, than the actual borrowed amount.