Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday December 09 2015, @11:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the glowing-review dept.

Writing in the August edition of Environmental Science and Technology Letters, Jason Nolan and Karrie A. Weber of the University of Nebraska report unsafe levels of uranium in groundwater from California's San Joaquin Valley and from the Ogallala Aquifer underlying Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Colorado, Kansas, Wyoming and South Dakota.

In Natural Uranium Contamination in Major U.S. Aquifers Linked to Nitrate they note a correlation between concentrations of uranium and nitrate ions in the groundwater samples they tested. They theorize that the nitrate, a major component of fertilizer, can oxidize uranium from U(IV) to U(VI), making it water-soluble. They found that in the San Joaquin Valley, uranium reached as much as 180 times the maximum contaminant level (MCL) set by the Environmental Protection Agency, and nitrate was as much as 34 times the MCL. Samples from the Ogallala Aquifer had as much as 89 times the MCL of uranium and 189 times the MCL of nitrate.

Water from these aquifers is used for drinking and for irrigation. Soluble uranium is bioaccumulated by certain food crops; uranium in the human body can result in cancer and kidney damage.

The Associated Press also reported on the story.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by MikeRo on Wednesday December 09 2015, @04:36PM

    by MikeRo (1436) on Wednesday December 09 2015, @04:36PM (#273987)

    Different animal. I don't think you can compare exposure to elevated background radiation to ingesting food with elevated levels of radiation. Plus part of the problem is this isotope of U is toxic all by itself without counting radiation.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by gnuman on Thursday December 10 2015, @04:02AM

    by gnuman (5013) on Thursday December 10 2015, @04:02AM (#274259)

    this isotope of U is toxic all by itself without counting radiation.

    Why are you even mentioning isotopes? All isotopes have basically the same chemical properties, they only differ in atomic mass.

    From Oxford dictionary,

    each of two or more forms of the same element that contain equal numbers of protons but different numbers of neutrons in their nuclei, and hence differ in relative atomic mass but not in chemical properties; in particular, a radioactive form of an element.