Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday December 10 2015, @11:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the non-voting-person-OR-non-person-voter dept.

The LA Times and just about every news outlet has a story about a Supreme Court case which could change how election districts are drawn up.

At issue before the court was the basic question of who gets counted when election districts are drawn: Is it all people, including children, prisoners and immigrants who are not eligible to vote? Or is it only adult citizens who are eligible voters?

The case centers around districts with heavy concentrations of people not eligible to vote (generally illegal aliens). These are counted by the census, and that district gets legislative representation based on their presence, even when there are fewer actual voters in those districts. The plaintiffs claim this give more weight to voters in such district, over an equal number of voters in other districts.

The challengers cited the example of two Texas state Senate districts, both of which have about 800,000 residents. One rural district in east Texas, where plaintiff Sue Evenwel resides, had about 574,000 citizens who are eligible to vote; the other district in the Rio Grande valley had only 372,000 people who are eligible to vote. The lawsuit in Evenwel vs. Abbott argues this is unconstitutional.

Do Soylentils see the allocation of election districts as a process to distribute legislative seats equally over the number of voters, or equally over the number of people (regardless of whether those people can vote or not)? (Or is this where we launch off on the usual discussions of a total redesign of the US Voting system to some totally different mathematical model?)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 10 2015, @12:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 10 2015, @12:33PM (#274392)

    In other words, a shameless vote grab by Desperate democrats for welfare gimme-gimmes.

    Let's hope it fails. We dont need kids and leeches voting.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Disagree=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 2) by zocalo on Thursday December 10 2015, @02:10PM

    by zocalo (302) on Thursday December 10 2015, @02:10PM (#274429)
    There seems to be a bit of confusion over this point; my understanding is that this has nothing to do with providing votes for those that don't already have it but rather to do with assigning voting districts based on the population of actual voters instead of the current system based around the total population. In otherwords, a town that consists mostly of adults that can vote will get more legislative representation that a similar sized town with a lot of kids, criminals, illegal immigrants, and other non-voters.
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 10 2015, @04:20PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 10 2015, @04:20PM (#274496)

    You have no idea what you are talking about.

    No one is going to let kids or illegal immigrants vote.

    This has to do in whether they count for districting purposes. The hope on the Right is that they don't, which will allow them to gerrymander the districts worse then they are.

    If anyone is playing games here it is the right. (Not saying the left doesnt do shady stuff, Hillary..., BUT in this instance its shady on the right side of the political divide. )