SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the non-voting-person-OR-non-person-voter dept.
The LA Times and just about every news outlet has a story about a Supreme Court case which could change how election districts are drawn up.
At issue before the court was the basic question of who gets counted when election districts are drawn: Is it all people, including children, prisoners and immigrants who are not eligible to vote? Or is it only adult citizens who are eligible voters?
The case centers around districts with heavy concentrations of people not eligible to vote (generally illegal aliens). These are counted by the census, and that district gets legislative representation based on their presence, even when there are fewer actual voters in those districts. The plaintiffs claim this give more weight to voters in such district, over an equal number of voters in other districts.
The challengers cited the example of two Texas state Senate districts, both of which have about 800,000 residents. One rural district in east Texas, where plaintiff Sue Evenwel resides, had about 574,000 citizens who are eligible to vote; the other district in the Rio Grande valley had only 372,000 people who are eligible to vote. The lawsuit in Evenwel vs. Abbott argues this is unconstitutional.
Do Soylentils see the allocation of election districts as a process to distribute legislative seats equally over the number of voters, or equally over the number of people (regardless of whether those people can vote or not)? (Or is this where we launch off on the usual discussions of a total redesign of the US Voting system to some totally different mathematical model?)
(Score: 2) by fritsd on Thursday December 10 2015, @06:45PM
There could be different overlapping collectives, and that you don't count for some of them.
For example, the last election, I could vote for two of the three ballots:
- I was allowed to vote for the local community election, because I'm registered as an 18+ inhabitant of my community ("domicile", I suppose).
- I was DISallowed to vote for the national election (I could see in the voting book that that was pre-crossed-out in printing next to my name), because I don't have the nationality.
- I was allowed to vote for the Europarliament election, because I'm still Eurotrash.
So maybe those Mexicans whom Trump fulminates against would be eligible to vote for the NAFTA elections, if there is such a thing ;-)