SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
People complain about where Mozilla's money goes... Well...
From The Mozilla Open Source Blog:
We are delighted to announce the first set of awards in the Mozilla Open Source Support program's "Foundational Technology" track, which supports projects that Mozilla uses or relies upon.>
...
The first seven awardees are:
Buildbot: $15,000. Buildbot is a continuous build and integration system which has been immensely valuable to Mozilla over the past few years. Their award will be used to remove the term "slave" from all documentation, APIs and tests, and also to make improvements so Buildbot works better in the Amazon EC2 cloud.
CodeMirror: $20,000. CodeMirror is a powerful source code editor built with Web technologies, used in the Developer Tools and in Mozilla Thimble. Their award will be used to improve support for both right-to-left languages and complex script input.
Discourse: $25,000. Discourse is online discussion forum software, used by several Mozilla communities. Their award will be used to make email a first-class interaction mechanism for Discourse, allowing Discourse instances to replace and improve upon mailing lists.
Read The Docs: $48,000. Read The Docs is a website for building and hosting documentation, used by many of Mozilla's Web projects. Their award will be used to add the ability to generate documentation from code without needing to install it, thereby making it easier to build the documentation for complex projects.
Mercurial: $75,000. Mercurial is a distributed source code management system, used heavily by Mozilla for core repositories such as mozilla-central. Their award will be used to implement better support for 'blame' (showing who last changed some code) and a better web UI.
Django: $150,000. Django is a popular server-side Web development framework, used in many Mozilla websites. Their award will be used to make Django suitable to be a back end for Web apps which use WebSockets.
Bro: $200,000. Bro is network monitoring software, which is at the heart of Mozilla's intrusion detection system for our network. Their award will be used to build the Comprehensive Bro Archive Network, a public repository of modules and plugins for Bro.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by vux984 on Friday December 11 2015, @10:03PM
"Their award will be used to remove the term "slave" from all documentation"
Seriously? Master/slave when in the context of software, or circuits, etc needs to be purged from the code and documentation? I like the idea of Mozilla giving some money to some of the projects it uses... but the ear mark on this one seems just silly. Are black american's really offended by "slave server" or "slave circuits" or "master copies"..? Really? Why?
Its all the more absurdist since they are giving $200,000 to "Bro"... yet that isn't earmarked to rename 'Bro' to something else, since 'bro'-culture is offensive to a lot of people too, especially women?
And Django is now most widely recognized as a Tarantino movie about actual slaves/slavery...
So they're giving 15k to remove the word slaves from a project that used it as a technical term with no offense intended or likely committed.
Ten times that to another project that is far more associated with the word slave than "Buildbot" ever was.
Then they give even more than that to a project named "Bro" seemingly completely oblivious the word "Bro" is recently become offensive to a lot of people.
Makes you wonder.
(Score: 2) by chromas on Friday December 11 2015, @10:17PM
But don't you see? They're Unchaining Django!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 11 2015, @10:29PM
Now, with the extra funding, maybe the Django team will be able to purchase some necessary hardware. Such as more female plugs for their male...
Uh oh.
(Score: 0, Troll) by NotSanguine on Friday December 11 2015, @10:30PM
So they're giving 15k to remove the word slaves from a project that used it as a technical term with no offense intended or likely committed.
Ten times that to another project that is far more associated with the word slave than "Buildbot" ever was.
Then they give even more than that to a project named "Bro" seemingly completely oblivious the word "Bro" is recently become offensive to a lot of people.
If those are really the issues you have, don't use the products in question.
There are very few reasons to restrict speech, and your (and other people's) thin skin is not one of those reasons.
Nothing I (or anyone else, for that matter) say can actually injure you. They are just words. If you don't like the words certain people use, that's too bad.
If you have nothing better to do than chastise people for their language use, why don't you lobby to limit the freedom of speech? I imagine that would suit your authoritarian impulses.
You're not the arbiter of speech. Appropriate speech is the speech anyone chooses to use. You are welcome to say what you want (including the drivel you just spewed), but don't think you won't be called on your advocacy of censorship or your authoritarian world view.
Personally, I'm glad you find those words offensive and my sincere wish is that people continue to offend you for many years to come.
What's more, go fuck yourself vux984. Does that offend you? I sure hope so.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 11 2015, @10:33PM
Reading comprehension isn't really your strong suit, eh? You do realize that statement you quoted was pointing out how absurd and hypocritical the things Mozilla was asking for to be done, right?
(Score: 2) by Lunix Nutcase on Friday December 11 2015, @10:34PM
Except they never say they are offended. What you quoted was pointing out the hypocrisy of Mozilla. Way to completely miss the point. *golf clap*
(Score: 3, Insightful) by vux984 on Friday December 11 2015, @11:05PM
If those are really the issues you have, don't use the products in question.
I don't have those "issues".
There are very few reasons to restrict speech, and your (and other people's) thin skin is not one of those reasons.
And seeing as I don't have those issues, most of the rest of your post serves to flame an imaginary person you projected onto me. But that's ok. I agree with your argument; although its a bit weird to actually watch someone burn an effigy of oneself. Thanks for that.
My original post had 2 parts:
part 1 -- to express ridicule and disgust that Mozilla thinks spending 15,000 to remove the word 'slave' from software documentation involving a technical meaning of master/slave. I think its ridiculous. (Evidence I don't have the 'issues' you mentioned.)
part 2 -- to express further ridicule and disgust that Mozilla is not only doing something ridiculous as described above, but that they managed to be completely oblivious to the ironry of paying $15,000 to remove the word slave from one package while endorsing "Bro" with 10 times the endowment without so much as batting an eye.
(Score: 2, Flamebait) by NotSanguine on Friday December 11 2015, @11:14PM
And seeing as I don't have those issues, most of the rest of your post serves to flame an imaginary person you projected onto me. But that's ok. I agree with your argument; although its a bit weird to actually watch someone burn an effigy of oneself. Thanks for that.
My original post had 2 parts:
part 1 -- to express ridicule and disgust that Mozilla thinks spending 15,000 to remove the word 'slave' from software documentation involving a technical meaning of master/slave. I think its ridiculous. (Evidence I don't have the 'issues' you mentioned.)
part 2 -- to express further ridicule and disgust that Mozilla is not only doing something ridiculous as described above, but that they managed to be completely oblivious to the ironry of paying $15,000 to remove the word slave from one package while endorsing "Bro" with 10 times the endowment without so much as batting an eye.
My mistake. And I don't even have an 'ethanol fueled' excuse either. Sigh.
I guess I can take some solace in knowing that while I was completely off the reservation, I at least did so with purpose and gusto. Yay me!
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 11 2015, @11:15PM
It's ok. Those of us with elementary school level reading comprehension got your point. GP is simply a tard.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 11 2015, @11:07PM
It reminds me of Julia Robert in the movie "Erin Brocovich" - she had a way of getting angrier the longer she ranted.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 12 2015, @02:23AM
Its all the more absurdist since they are giving $200,000 to "Bro"... yet that isn't earmarked to rename 'Bro' to something else, since 'bro'-culture is offensive to a lot of people too, especially women?
God the whining from you people is so annoying. Unless you can show that someone did apply for a grant to rename "Bro" with a plan that that had a good chance of success, there is no hypocrisy to whine about. Never mind that "Bro culture" is not a derogatory term, its self-applied. The day that people voluntarily and enthusiastically call themselves slaves then the comparison will be appropriate, until then all you are doing is failing basic SAT word analogy tests because slave::derogatory is not the same as bro::derogatory.
If you want to rename the "Bro" project then apply for a grant to do it yourself. I'm sure you won't because all you are is a keyboard warrior ranting about stuff he doesn't quite grasp because it gives him the good feels.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 12 2015, @11:54AM
The thing is that social feces warriors are offended by everything, including the term "bro". Why remove "slave" from one project but not rename another project? Even the act of clapping offends some feces warriors, so they instead choose to snap their fingers.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 12 2015, @02:23PM
> The thing is that social feces warriors are offended by everything,
Well of course they are, what do you expect when people like you intend to offend with everything?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 12 2015, @05:11PM
That doesn't make any sense. For one thing, it's false that people like me intend to offend with everything (where "everything" means "a lot"). Second of all, even if someone intends to offend you, that does not mean you're obligated to be offended. For instance, if I said "Hello." with the intention of being offensive, I imagine that that would not be very effective.
Are you privy to what goes on in batshit insane social feces warrior blogs? I've seen some of it, and they are just crazy. They see things like sexism, racism, and bad intent where it simply does not exist, which makes them very similar to tinfoil hatters.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 12 2015, @07:06PM
> That doesn't make any sense.
What? Now you are complaining about making sense? Never looked into a mirror before that post?
(Score: 2) by vux984 on Sunday December 13 2015, @01:44AM
Never mind that "Bro culture" is not a derogatory term, its self-applied.
I didn't say "derogatory"; I said "offensive". The rest of your post falls apart as a result.
To elaborate on the difference here, imagine a software project called "KKK dashboard" a color correction tool for photos and video. KKK members self apply the label... so its not a derogatory term and I'm sure nobody will be offended.
For what its worth, I'm not offended by "Bro" software. And I'm not offended by the word slave in buildbot either. I think taking offense to either is ridiculous. But if I were the sort of SJW who was offended by the word slave in buildbot, I expect I'd be equally upset by "Bro" software; so its eyebrow raising that whoever at Mozilla thought slave had to be purged from buildbot didn't bat an eye at giving 200k to "Bro".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 12 2015, @02:48AM
> So they're giving 15k to remove the word slaves from a project that used it as a technical term with no offense intended or likely committed.
Hey vux! How much do you think they are giving to make improvements so Buildbot works better in the Amazon EC2 cloud?
What's that? Nothing? That is free with the word replacement? Buy one get one of equal or greater cost for free? Wattadeal!
(Score: 2) by vux984 on Sunday December 13 2015, @01:33AM
Frankly, I'm disgusted that the use of the word 'slave' in the context used in the Buildbot documentation is even an issue to anyone that isn't nuts; at any price.