Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday December 12 2015, @01:53PM   Printer-friendly
from the non-biodegradeable dept.

Some personal care products, such as shower gels, soaps, shampoo, facial scrubs and toothpastes, are formulated with plastic microbeads. The colorful particles, made usually from polyethylene (but sometimes from nylon, polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate or polymethyl methacrylate), serve as abrasives and add visual appeal to the products. Unfortunately, they are small enough to pass through sewage treatment plants into waterways and oceans, where they can persist. In the aquatic environment, the microbeads can absorb other pollutants and can be ingested by animals, resulting in an increase in the amount of those pollutants in the food chain.

Under the proposed legislation, called the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015, manufacturing could continue until July 1, 2017 and sales would be phased out from 2018 through 2019. The House bill was sponsored by Republican Fred Upton of Michigan and Democrat Frank Pallone, Jr. of New Jersey. A similar bill is under consideration in the Senate.

In July, the International Campaign Against Microbeads in Cosmetics has made a list of products which contained microbeads.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Sir Finkus on Saturday December 12 2015, @06:38PM

    by Sir Finkus (192) on Saturday December 12 2015, @06:38PM (#275468) Journal

    But, from the pictures I've seen, being able to sail through it without seeing it, not a chance.

    A lot of the pictures of it aren't really even pictures of it, just stock picture of garbage floating in water, usually in costal areas.

    From wikipedia:

    The patch is characterized by exceptionally high relative concentrations of pelagic plastics, chemical sludge and other debris that have been trapped by the currents of the North Pacific Gyre.[2] Despite its large area, it is of very low density (4 particles per cubic meter), therefore not visible from satellite photography, nor even necessarily to casual boaters or divers in the area. It consists primarily of a small increase in suspended, often microscopic particles in the upper water column.

    Still an environmental disaster, but a lot of the portrayals of it are downright dishonest.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2