SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Journal publisher Elsevier has agreed to open up some of the research published by Dutch researchers... by 2018:
A standoff between Dutch universities and publishing giant Elsevier is finally over. After more than a year of negotiations—and a threat to boycott Elsevier's 2500 journals—a deal has been struck: For no additional charge beyond subscription fees, 30% of research published by Dutch researchers in Elsevier journals will be open access by 2018.
"It's not the 100% that I hoped for," says Gerard Meijer, the president of Radboud University in Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and the lead negotiator on the Dutch side. "But this is the future. No one can stop this anymore."
The dispute involves a mandate announced in January 2014 by Sander Dekker, the Dutch minister responsible for higher education. It requires that 60% of government-funded research papers should be free to the public by 2019, and 100% by 2024. His argument, one echoed by academics around the world, is that the public has traditionally paid twice for research: once to fund the research and then again to read the results. But for-profit publishing companies like Elsevier have argued that someone has to pay for the cost of the publication, either universities paying for subscriptions, or scientists paying article processing charges to make their papers open access. (Advocates counter that the prices for both are too high considering that most of the editing and all of the reviewing is unpaid work done by academics.)
This isn't the first time researchers have agitated against Elsevier. An unenforced boycott against Elsevier journals has been running for years in the United Kingdom, though with little impact, and some universities have tried to play hardball. The Dutch gambit was different, Meijer says. "For one thing, it helped that Elsevier is based in Amsterdam," he says. "It would be very bad for them to lose the Dutch scientific community." Meijer admits that the Netherlands is a small fish. "We only publish about 2% of academic papers. But the quality of our papers is above average and we're big enough to be taken seriously."
Previously: Elsevier Cracks Down on "Pirate" Science Search Engines
(Score: 2) by hankwang on Monday December 14 2015, @07:30AM
Of course, Elsevier is ripping off the libraries. But still, the work of the publisher costs money and has added value. The scientific editors are typically professors who do it "for free", i.e. in exchange for a free subscription and a preview of the manuscripts before they are published. But they need paid administrative staff to handle the correspondence - reviewers as well.as editors who are lagging. You need correctors who tidy up the language of non-native speakers (and some native speakers as well). Typesetters who transform an MS Word file into publication-grade layout. (Even LaTeX in the CS, math, and theoretical physics fields usually needs tweaking.) Servers and server administration aren't free either.
A real cost of €100 for a rejected paper and €400 for an accepted one is not unreasonable.
Avantslash: SoylentNews for mobile [avantslash.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 14 2015, @02:24PM
(Even LaTeX in the CS, math, and theoretical physics fields usually needs tweaking.)
Sadly, none of those tweaks is 'switch the font to something besides Computer Modern'. Yuck.
(Score: 2) by hankwang on Monday December 14 2015, @03:57PM
Computer Modern is a bit boring because it makes all LaTeX'ed papers look the same. But most journals are in Times (New) Roman, which doesn't look that much better IMO. In TR, the lowercase italic v (vee) and Greek nu are very difficult to tell apart.
Not so many fonts have a matching math font. For my PhD thesis I spent several days on making the math look nice in combination with the text font of my choice.
Avantslash: SoylentNews for mobile [avantslash.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 14 2015, @05:09PM
What font did you end up using?