Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Monday December 14 2015, @03:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the who-shot-first dept.

With the imminent release of the new Star Wars film, The Force Awakens, many theatergoers are re-watching the original movies to reacquaint themselves with those stories from a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. This time, however, they may find themselves surprised by how much the film's characters and themes echo the current War On Terror. According to Jonathon Last, in the Star Wars films (not the Expanded Universe) the Empire is good and is engaged in a fight for the survival of its regime against a violent group of rebels who are committed to its destruction. Now an interesting article on the Star Wars films at Decider takes the re-interpretation a step further, arguing that the films are actually the story of the radicalization of Luke Skywalker. From introducing Luke to us in A New Hope (as a simple farm boy gazing into the Tatooine sunset), to his eventual transformation into the radicalized insurgent of Return of the Jedi (as one who sets his own father's corpse on fire and celebrates the successful bombing of the Death Star), each film in the original trilogy is another step in Luke's descent into terrorism.

According to the article Luke Skywalker is just the kind of isolated disaffected young man that terror recruiters seek out. Obi Wan — a religious fanatic with a history of looking for young boys to recruit and teach an extreme interpretation of the Force — tells Luke he must abandon his family and join him, going so far as telling a shocking lie that the Empire killed Luke's father, hoping to inspire Luke to a life of jihad. In The Empire Strikes Back, Luke is ordered to travel overseas to receive training and religious instruction from Yoda, an extremist cleric who runs a Jedi madrasa on Dagobah. Yoda's push to radicalize Luke, rob him of an identity, and instill obedience are apparent when at various points he instructs Luke to "Clear your mind of questions," "Unlearn what you have learned" and, most grimly, "Do, or do not, there is no try." Armed with new combat training and cloaked in a hardline religious fervor, Luke leaves Dagobah, impatient to put his terror training to use.Finally in Return of the Jedi, we see a darker, hardened Luke, fittingly dressed in black and eager to use violence as a tool to enforce the twisted "judge, jury, executioner" value system of the Jedi. "With Darth Vader the final casualty of Luke's jihad, Obi-Wan and Yoda have succeeded in catching yet another young man in their web of Jedi extremism," concludes the article. "Star Wars is clearly a cautionary tale of the dangers of radicalization, and how even a seemingly harmless young man who kept to himself on Tattooine can become the terrorist next door."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 14 2015, @06:00PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 14 2015, @06:00PM (#276220)

    Don't forget that immediately after the North won the war, the USA freed *all* slaves in the country. The Constitutional Amendment to abolish slavery was drafted before the war was even over and was passed by both Houses on January 1865, and took effect December 6, 1865 when at least 3/4 of the states (including the defeated Southern states) ratified it. The proper Constitutional process was followed to abolish slavery.

    And while one might say slavery wasn't the *only* reason for the Civil War, it was certainly the 90% reason. Written proclamations from the Southern state legislatures that seceded said so. The question at issue was, would the new frontier territories being admitted into the Union be slave or free? Would the South be allowed to expand or keep its current borders?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by curunir_wolf on Tuesday December 15 2015, @01:42AM

    by curunir_wolf (4772) on Tuesday December 15 2015, @01:42AM (#276462)

    The Constitutional Amendment to abolish slavery was drafted before the war was even over and was passed by both Houses on January 1865, and took effect December 6, 1865 when at least 3/4 of the states (including the defeated Southern states) ratified it.

    Yes, but recall that it was ratified, along with the 14th and 15th, by duress. The Southern states were required to ratify all of these amendments, and while the 13th was a straight-forward correction of the freedom-for-all ideal of the United States, the others imposed significant structural changes to the Union, consolidating more power with the central government than ever before conceived...

    --
    I am a crackpot