Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Monday December 14 2015, @03:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the who-shot-first dept.

With the imminent release of the new Star Wars film, The Force Awakens, many theatergoers are re-watching the original movies to reacquaint themselves with those stories from a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. This time, however, they may find themselves surprised by how much the film's characters and themes echo the current War On Terror. According to Jonathon Last, in the Star Wars films (not the Expanded Universe) the Empire is good and is engaged in a fight for the survival of its regime against a violent group of rebels who are committed to its destruction. Now an interesting article on the Star Wars films at Decider takes the re-interpretation a step further, arguing that the films are actually the story of the radicalization of Luke Skywalker. From introducing Luke to us in A New Hope (as a simple farm boy gazing into the Tatooine sunset), to his eventual transformation into the radicalized insurgent of Return of the Jedi (as one who sets his own father's corpse on fire and celebrates the successful bombing of the Death Star), each film in the original trilogy is another step in Luke's descent into terrorism.

According to the article Luke Skywalker is just the kind of isolated disaffected young man that terror recruiters seek out. Obi Wan — a religious fanatic with a history of looking for young boys to recruit and teach an extreme interpretation of the Force — tells Luke he must abandon his family and join him, going so far as telling a shocking lie that the Empire killed Luke's father, hoping to inspire Luke to a life of jihad. In The Empire Strikes Back, Luke is ordered to travel overseas to receive training and religious instruction from Yoda, an extremist cleric who runs a Jedi madrasa on Dagobah. Yoda's push to radicalize Luke, rob him of an identity, and instill obedience are apparent when at various points he instructs Luke to "Clear your mind of questions," "Unlearn what you have learned" and, most grimly, "Do, or do not, there is no try." Armed with new combat training and cloaked in a hardline religious fervor, Luke leaves Dagobah, impatient to put his terror training to use.Finally in Return of the Jedi, we see a darker, hardened Luke, fittingly dressed in black and eager to use violence as a tool to enforce the twisted "judge, jury, executioner" value system of the Jedi. "With Darth Vader the final casualty of Luke's jihad, Obi-Wan and Yoda have succeeded in catching yet another young man in their web of Jedi extremism," concludes the article. "Star Wars is clearly a cautionary tale of the dangers of radicalization, and how even a seemingly harmless young man who kept to himself on Tattooine can become the terrorist next door."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by captain_nifty on Monday December 14 2015, @06:27PM

    by captain_nifty (4252) on Monday December 14 2015, @06:27PM (#276234)

    What is far too often missed in todays society is using words based on what they actually mean, not to try and prove a point.

    You are not a terrorist if you fight for a religious cause, even if unpopular.

    You are not a terrorist if you fight against an established government.

    You are not a terrorist if you commit a large scale murder.

    You are a terrorist if your fighting is directed against civilian targets with the intent to provoke terror.

    An established state can in fact be a terrorist state, I think the empire more than qualifies by blowing up an entire civilian planet solely in order to instill fear.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by isostatic on Monday December 14 2015, @06:47PM

    by isostatic (365) on Monday December 14 2015, @06:47PM (#276244) Journal

    You are a terrorist if your fighting is directed against civilian targets with the intent to provoke terror.

    Only two groups of people trying to provoke terror today, and the main one is the media.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 14 2015, @10:58PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 14 2015, @10:58PM (#276387)

      I thought in politics and propganda, terrorists are the same as boogeymen, as the same as communists and so on.

      There can only be one Emmanuel Goldstein, but he doesn't have to go by that name or even exist more than any other deity or belief system does. Proof defies faith, and all of that. Therefore, if you do not believe in us you are faithless and the faithless are godless and untrustworthy.