SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
With the imminent release of the new Star Wars film, The Force Awakens, many theatergoers are re-watching the original movies to reacquaint themselves with those stories from a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. This time, however, they may find themselves surprised by how much the film's characters and themes echo the current War On Terror. According to Jonathon Last, in the Star Wars films (not the Expanded Universe) the Empire is good and is engaged in a fight for the survival of its regime against a violent group of rebels who are committed to its destruction. Now an interesting article on the Star Wars films at Decider takes the re-interpretation a step further, arguing that the films are actually the story of the radicalization of Luke Skywalker. From introducing Luke to us in A New Hope (as a simple farm boy gazing into the Tatooine sunset), to his eventual transformation into the radicalized insurgent of Return of the Jedi (as one who sets his own father's corpse on fire and celebrates the successful bombing of the Death Star), each film in the original trilogy is another step in Luke's descent into terrorism.
According to the article Luke Skywalker is just the kind of isolated disaffected young man that terror recruiters seek out. Obi Wan — a religious fanatic with a history of looking for young boys to recruit and teach an extreme interpretation of the Force — tells Luke he must abandon his family and join him, going so far as telling a shocking lie that the Empire killed Luke's father, hoping to inspire Luke to a life of jihad. In The Empire Strikes Back, Luke is ordered to travel overseas to receive training and religious instruction from Yoda, an extremist cleric who runs a Jedi madrasa on Dagobah. Yoda's push to radicalize Luke, rob him of an identity, and instill obedience are apparent when at various points he instructs Luke to "Clear your mind of questions," "Unlearn what you have learned" and, most grimly, "Do, or do not, there is no try." Armed with new combat training and cloaked in a hardline religious fervor, Luke leaves Dagobah, impatient to put his terror training to use.Finally in Return of the Jedi, we see a darker, hardened Luke, fittingly dressed in black and eager to use violence as a tool to enforce the twisted "judge, jury, executioner" value system of the Jedi. "With Darth Vader the final casualty of Luke's jihad, Obi-Wan and Yoda have succeeded in catching yet another young man in their web of Jedi extremism," concludes the article. "Star Wars is clearly a cautionary tale of the dangers of radicalization, and how even a seemingly harmless young man who kept to himself on Tattooine can become the terrorist next door."
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 14 2015, @09:55PM
To play Devil's Advocate, the Western interference in the Middle East could be compared to the Empire. I'm sure many kids over there have been radicalized after having people they knew killed in various ways.
The thousands US has literally killed in Pakistan with drones kind of sums this up very nicely.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/29/john-oliver-drones-last-week-tonight_n_5899716.html [huffingtonpost.com]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4NRJoCNHIs [youtube.com]
But there are plenty of other ways that US and others kind of make themselves into "The Empire", the primary being that human rights go out the window when money is involved. Just look at Saudi Arabia and how well women are treated - they are supposedly human too? Saudis have been the source of most of the radical islamic terrorism, but no consequences. They literally fund terrorists. 9/11? Mostly from Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden? Yeap, he was mostly pissed at US when his attempt to provide "defense force" for Saudi Arabia was trumped by US (back in the 1970s, for those that don't know). Heck, the entire Iran problem with Islamic Revolution was caused by the west (British AND US) propping up dictatorship of Sha (king of Iran) for their oil companies.
Now, radicals like Bin Laden or ISILs are/were certainly not Sky Walker, but they came about because of western policies (and most definitely Israel is guilty here, irrespective of the Palestinian issue) of,
1. propping up dictators
2. thinking that "arabs only understand strength"
3. lack of nation building
Hell, even in Iraq where US stayed for almost a decade, the first thing that was done was complete dismantling of their government. It wasn't "kick out Hussein", it was kick out entire government and no wonder shit hit the fan (so Iraq is certainly not "nation building" example).
The more you suppress dissent, the more fucked up the opposition will emerge. Middle East desperately needs dissent to be "uncorked" or it will go up 10x worse than the Arab Spring - and that brought us Libyan and Syrian civil wars already.
So yes, Sky Walker is a glorified terrorist. In reality he'd be closer to ISIL than Rebels. ISIL is more evil not because they are without conscience, but because people can rationalize anything if they think they are "Right". Heck, look at the drone links above and how US can rationalize those extrajudicial killings - can't be much different from how ISIL rationalizes their insanity.