Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday December 17 2015, @03:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the get-your-swim-trunks dept.

Using data from a 3053-meter-long core of ice and bedrock collected from the center of the island in 1993, Schaefer's team has found valuable clues to what the period held. In particular, the 1.55 meters of bedrock at the core's base revealed much about the island's history of glaciation, Schaefer says, in atoms that chronicle exposure to the elements. Earth's surface is constantly bombarded by cosmic rays, high energy particles streaming into Earth from space. They collide with atoms in Earth's atmosphere as well as in the uppermost centimeters of its rocks, producing new particles. Some of those particles have a particularly useful set of properties: They don't naturally occur in the rocks, and they are radioactive. Thus, they can act as a sort of clock, marking time since the rocks were last ice free and exposed to the atmosphere.

Schaefer and his colleagues measured the abundance of two cosmogenic isotopes, aluminum-26 and beryllium-10, in grains of the mineral quartz that they found within the bedrock. Each isotope is produced at a different rate by cosmic rays and has a different half-life. Once the rocks are no longer exposed to the atmosphere—for example, buried by ice—the ratio of 26Al to 10Be in the rocks changes because of their differing half-lives. Schaefer and his team found that the ratio in the bedrock was simply too low for the site to have remained buried continuously over the last 1.25 million years—suggesting that it had been exposed and ice free at least once during that time.

Schaefer says he is certain the findings show that Greenland was ice free at one point


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by zocalo on Thursday December 17 2015, @09:50AM

    by zocalo (302) on Thursday December 17 2015, @09:50AM (#277617)
    That seems more likely to be two seperate but related melt offs. One of the theories knocking around for the current reduction in glaciation could work quite well for that historic scenario as well; the collapse of the Antarctic iceshelf and other vulnerable arctic glaciers for the initial smaller rise, followed a more general reduction of the ice mass in all the remaining glaciers, including those inland where the bulk of the ice is, caused by an increased albedo with the exchange of reflective glaciers for heat absorbing open ocean.
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 17 2015, @05:42PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 17 2015, @05:42PM (#277784)

    That should say decreased albedo, of course.

    • (Score: 2) by zocalo on Friday December 18 2015, @04:01PM

      by zocalo (302) on Friday December 18 2015, @04:01PM (#278234)
      Damn it. My bad. You win a +1 mod, Mr. AC, sir!
      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!