Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday December 27 2015, @01:48PM   Printer-friendly
from the call-a-cab dept.

Brought to you by the Department for Understanding Humans:

Men are more likely to go missing -- with a fatal outcome -- during a night out in the UK in December than at any other time of year, a new study led by an expert from London's Kingston University has revealed.

Preliminary findings released in the run-up to the festive period show that, of 97 cases recorded between January 2010 and August 2015 more than half the fatal disappearances occurred during winter, with a fifth in December alone. Five men were described as having been on a Christmas party and a further five as going missing on New Year's Eve or in the early hours of 1 January. The perils of waterways were a significant factor in the demise of 86 missing men found dead after last being seen socialising.

The release of the data has led to renewed calls for males to look after friends and colleagues when out celebrating during the Christmas party season -- with a particular focus on taking care when walking home near rivers, canals and docks.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Sunday December 27 2015, @07:45PM

    by frojack (1554) on Sunday December 27 2015, @07:45PM (#281488) Journal

    Its just a study of the UK.

    of 97 cases recorded between January 2010 and August 2015

    How many people can get fatally lost in a country that size after a night out drinking. Its probably not even a sample, but rather the entire population of "lost and found dead after an evening of drinking" cases over a 5 year period. In which cases statistical reliability is a moot point.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Dr Spin on Sunday December 27 2015, @09:36PM

    by Dr Spin (5239) on Sunday December 27 2015, @09:36PM (#281510)

    Damned right - the UK is so small that it is not significant, statistically, or any other way!

    I for one, have gone out drinking more than once in the UK and walked home without getting lost,
    sometimes after going to visit people who live the other side of the canal.

    This data cannot possibly be valid. Hold on, my whisky glass is empty.

    --
    Warning: Opening your mouth may invalidate your brain!
    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday December 28 2015, @06:06AM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday December 28 2015, @06:06AM (#281614) Journal

      I don't even live there, but I've gone out drinking in England and in Scotland, and found my way back to the ship without drowning. I hate to kick the Britons, but the whole country is only as large as one of our states. Not sure which one - it's certainly not as large as Texas or Alaska. How CAN you get lost? Almost anywhere you can stand (or fall) in England, you can hear the sound of traffic. If you can hear traffic, you can find a highway, where you can stop some unsuspecting motorist, and ask, "Where the hell am I?"

  • (Score: 1) by Francis on Monday December 28 2015, @01:00AM

    by Francis (5544) on Monday December 28 2015, @01:00AM (#281552)

    Exactly. The population of the UK is about 64m and physically it's rather small compared with the US. The US has over 300m people and is the 3rd largest country by area. There's a ton of places for people to go missing and a ton of people to go missing as well. Each year there's about 600k adults that go missing for one reason or another.

    That's everybody that's reported missing in a year, that presumably includes people that were just out of touch, purposefully lost contact as well as people where there was an actual death or criminal action. There's probably also a large number of mentally ill individuals included in the numbers as well.

    The article doesn't mention it being a sample, it's highly likely that it's more or less the whole population of people that have disappeared and been located afterwards.

    • (Score: 2) by frojack on Monday December 28 2015, @01:14AM

      by frojack (1554) on Monday December 28 2015, @01:14AM (#281557) Journal

      You forgot the After last being seen celebrating with a few drinks,... further lowering the universe size, to the point where sampling made no sense at all.

      --
      No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.