SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the what's-a-little-cash-between-friends dept.
Apple asked Samsung for a very big Christmas present this year: $180 million more in damages stemming from a long-running patent case.
Just weeks after Samsung agreed to pay Apple $548 million for infringing iPhone patents and designs, Apple filed papers in court Wednesday claiming its rival owes an additional $180 million in supplemental damages and interest.
The Cupertino, California-based Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment. South Korea-based Samsung declined to comment. The news was first reported Thursday by patent expert Florian Mueller on his FOSS Patents blog.
The trial in the case, which ended in 2012, cast a bright light on the designs behind some of the most popular smartphones. It captivated Silicon Valley and the tech industry because it exposed the inner workings of two notoriously secretive companies. A jury ultimately found that Samsung had violated key Apple patents and at the time came up with an award of more than $1 billion, which later got whittled down to almost half the amount.
Samsung has appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that it sets a precedent that could stifle innovation because it heightens companies' fears of legal challenges. The high court hasn't decided whether to accept the case for review.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 27 2015, @04:19PM
Can we please not shill for this dick here? Thank you kindly in advance.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 27 2015, @07:22PM
Certainly hoped it would be a Mueller free zone here.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Sunday December 27 2015, @07:52PM
The story is posted from a bot, and is word for word copy of a Cnet article.
Just how much editing are our editors supposed to do to filter any references to your pet interdict-list of sources?
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 3, Informative) by stormreaver on Monday December 28 2015, @02:44AM
Just how much editing are our editors supposed to do to filter any references to [morons speaking out of their asses]?
Would our editors be quite so cavalier if the bots were posting child-rearing advice from known child abusers? That's the level of idiocy that Florian Mueller likes to spout. Anyone who has read Groklaw has become intimately familiar with how absolutely incompetent Mr. Mueller is with regards to patents. His accuracy is far, far less than random chance (I don't think any of his patent predictions came even remotely close to what actually happened; as opposed to Pamela Jones of Groklaw, who accurately predicted almost every event for which she ventured an opinion), and his knowledge of patent law is ridiculously non-existent.