Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Monday December 28 2015, @08:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the nfo-opsec dept.

https://torrentfreak.com/how-hollywood-caught-the-uks-most-prolific-movie-pirates-151227/

Following a three year investigation by Hollywood-backed anti-piracy group the Federation Against Copyright Theft, last week five of the UK's most prolific movie pirates were sentenced in the West Midlands.

[...] "Over a number of years the groups illegally released online more than 2,500 films including Argo, the Avengers and Skyfall," FACT said in a statement.

Speaking at Wolverhampton Crown Court, FACT prosecutor David Groome said that the men had gone to great lengths to avoid being detected. But was that really the case and just how easy was it to track them down?

[... One pirate,] Baker92 had been a member of another release group DTRG, FACT again turned to Equifax. Presuming the '92' in his nickname related to his birth year, FACT searched for any person named Baker born in 1992 with an association to [a girl he gave a shoutout to] called Ria. This led FACT – and the police – to Reece Baker's front door.

[... Another pirate,] Cooperman666 was also an encoder for release group ANALOG and in their NFO files a Live.com email address was listed for contact. However, that same email address was also used for a Facebook account held in the name of Ben Cooper. That page revealed he lived in Wolverhampton and was born in 1981.

Same techniques that were used to find Dread Pirate Roberts of Silk Road. Do we really need global surveillance, or are these guys just low hanging fruit?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2015, @04:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2015, @04:33PM (#281734)

    ...vast databases being collected of personal information by corporations which have no accountability and have no reason to keep the data accurate.

    They have at least one reason for keeping your information accurate: inaccurate data is less valuable.

    The difficulty is that with so many secret databases, it is difficult to reliably poison the well. The best you can do is have many conflicting identities. But even then, they will find patterns (because people are creatures of habit)

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2015, @06:38PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 28 2015, @06:38PM (#281770)

    If they have any of my data at all, I would prefer that it is horribly inaccurate precisely because that is less valuable for them.

    And I think you're overestimating them. They aren't all-knowing and can't use magical tools to find every inconsequential pattern that might or might not exist.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by SanityCheck on Monday December 28 2015, @10:46PM

    by SanityCheck (5190) on Monday December 28 2015, @10:46PM (#281891)

    What they lack in accuracy they make up for in volume :)