Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Friday July 22 2016, @05:33AM   Printer-friendly
from the wild-bill dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

By all accounts, it was the most popular gala the Lady Taverners had ever held. Over 1,000 people packed the Park Lane Hilton in London on Oct. 30, 2009, with the crowd overflowing into the hallways, to listen to President Bill Clinton speak on the power of giving.

While Clinton’s speech helped raise a substantial sum for the prominent cricket charity, his staggering $290,000 speaking fee was not covered by the group, according to organizers. The fee also was not covered by “World Management Limited,” the marketing company Hillary Clinton listed as the payment source in her federal financial filings.

It was bankrolled by a wealthy British businessman named Robert Whitton—a name you won’t find included in the Clintons’ public disclosure forms.

A review by the Washington Free Beacon found that Hillary Clinton often listed small foreign speaking firms as the sources of her husband’s lecture payments in her Senate and State Department disclosures, even though the actual paychecks came from undisclosed third parties.

In certain cases, these funders had interests that intersected with the U.S. State Department. Whitton, a real estate mogul, had business pending before UNESCO, an international agency that received a quarter of its funding from the State Department.

Source: The Washington Free Beacon


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by Phoenix666 on Friday July 22 2016, @11:18AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday July 22 2016, @11:18AM (#378448) Journal

    The Haiti take was nowhere near a billion. It was $60 million. Maybe the in-kind contributions would tally higher, but that's all the corporations inflating figures for taking tax-write-downs on equipment they couldn't sell in the downmarket it was at the time. The $60 million was placed in the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund, where it funds the salaries of Clinton and Bush cronies and occasionally pays consultants' fees to other Clinton and Bush cronies. The Clintons themselves don't take any money from it.

    That's what happened to the cash. What happened to the in-kind contributions is they were incompetently handled, delivered months and years too late, and were immediately disappeared into the black market and the sticky fingers of government officials in Haiti. That, BTW, is a larger tale of woe that implicates the entire international aid community from the USAID to the Red Cross to the State Department and the various UN relief agencies; because they are all stacked with so many incompetent cronies that nobody there knows even the barest ABCs of logistics or crisis management. Remember that guy, "Heckuva Job!" Brownie that Bush tapped from the Arabian Horse Association to run FEMA, and how badly he fucked up the relief to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina? It's like that.

    Most people are too absorbed in tabloid minutiae and the crushing realities of their daily economic situations to grasp how utterly intellectually and morally bereft and benighted the engines of government and industry are, but they ought to because they're parasitically sucking the future out of humanity.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by n1 on Friday July 22 2016, @05:09PM

    by n1 (993) on Friday July 22 2016, @05:09PM (#378651) Journal

    Generally related:

    Norad reports that the Norwegian contributions to the Clinton Foundation have amounted to $89.6 million (747 million kroner) between 2007 and 2015, while the Clinton Foundation’s website lists the support as between $10 and $25 million.

    Dagbladet also pointed out that the Clinton Health Access Initiative, which has been an independent organization since 2010, has received Norwegian financial support that is not reflected amongst the list of donations to the Clinton Foundation.

    The newspaper then reported that an internal memo from Norad contends that Foreign Minister Børge Brende broke the government’s own foreign aid principles by giving the Clinton Foundation 30 million kroner last year.

    [...] None of the 27 countries included in the Clinton Foundation's program to replace contaminated diesel generators are part of the Norwegian government's list of priority assistance countries.

      Dagbladet reported that the donations that the Clinton Foundation has received from Australia is also split in the same way as the Norwegian contributions.

    Swedish contributions to the Clinton Foundation have also been called into question. According to reports from last summer, the bulk of the money deposited in a Swedish arm of the Clinton family's global foundation was transferred while Hillary Clinton was US Secretary of State, and was liaising with Sweden over its controversial business links with Iran.

    http://www.thelocal.no/20160704/norways-funding-of-clinton-foundation-under-scrutiny [thelocal.no]

    http://charlesortel.com/tag/Clinton%20Foundation [charlesortel.com]