Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday July 22 2016, @06:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-longer-second-class-citizens dept.

Bosses do not need consent for temps to unionize in mixed bargaining units

Working In These Times reports

[In a 3-1 decision,] the National Labor Relations Board on [June 11] overturned a Bush-era standard that said a union could only organize a bargaining unit of jointly employed and regular employees if both employers consented--even if those employees worked together closely. "Jointly employed" includes temps who are hired through staffing agencies.

The new decision allows jointly employed temps to bargain collectively in the same unit with the solely employed workers they work alongside, ruling that bosses need not consent so long as workers share a "community of interest".

[...] In this new ruling from Miller & Anderson, Inc., the Board returns to a standard set in 2000, during the Clinton administration, in a case called M.B. Sturgis, Inc., which was overruled in Oakwood [Care Center].

[...] In a statement announcing the ruling, the NLRB said, "requiring employer consent to an otherwise appropriate bargaining unit desired by employees, Oakwood has ... allowed employers to shape their ideal bargaining unit, which is precisely the opposite of what Congress intended".

The ruling represents a blow to corporations that have moved forcefully, sometimes overwhelmingly, toward using temporary workers in an effort to block worker benefits and collective bargaining.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by bob_super on Friday July 22 2016, @07:25PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday July 22 2016, @07:25PM (#378732)

    > are appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate

    That should solve the problem quickly.
    Now that the senate is allowed to ignore the President's nominations which are explicitly called for in the Constitution, then making sure nobody is ever confirmed to any pesky "board" merely set up by a law shouldn't be a problem.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by jdavidb on Friday July 22 2016, @07:37PM

    by jdavidb (5690) on Friday July 22 2016, @07:37PM (#378736) Homepage Journal
    Now if we could just stop having a President and a Senate, too, we'd be in really good shape.
    --
    ⓋⒶ☮✝🕊 Secession is the right of all sentient beings
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday July 22 2016, @07:51PM

      by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday July 22 2016, @07:51PM (#378743) Journal

      If you really believe this you're either insane or evil...

      --
      I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by GungnirSniper on Friday July 22 2016, @09:39PM

        by GungnirSniper (1671) on Friday July 22 2016, @09:39PM (#378802) Journal

        That could be better than the nearly omnipotent power they have now. Or at least be interesting.

        The Founding Fathers correctly understood that the closer government is to the citizens, the more accountable and trustworthy it would be, as they were ruled by a Parliament over the sea. They did not intend for the Federal government to be supreme in all subject areas, though they neither anticipated the improvements in technology and business rules that would make that position less ideal.

  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Friday July 22 2016, @10:48PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Friday July 22 2016, @10:48PM (#378830)

    Now that the senate is allowed to ignore the President's nominations which are explicitly called for in the Constitution, then making sure nobody is ever confirmed to any pesky "board" merely set up by a law shouldn't be a problem.

    That was indeed a tactic in heavy use for the last couple of decades to cripple the NLRB. The basic idea was that if the NLRB didn't have quorum, then they couldn't enforce labor laws, which meant that major corporations (read: major donors to both parties) could violate those labor laws with impunity.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 23 2016, @12:34AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 23 2016, @12:34AM (#378858)

      the senate is allowed to ignore the President's nominations

      Recess appointment [wikipedia.org]

      -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]