Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday July 22 2016, @06:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-longer-second-class-citizens dept.

Bosses do not need consent for temps to unionize in mixed bargaining units

Working In These Times reports

[In a 3-1 decision,] the National Labor Relations Board on [June 11] overturned a Bush-era standard that said a union could only organize a bargaining unit of jointly employed and regular employees if both employers consented--even if those employees worked together closely. "Jointly employed" includes temps who are hired through staffing agencies.

The new decision allows jointly employed temps to bargain collectively in the same unit with the solely employed workers they work alongside, ruling that bosses need not consent so long as workers share a "community of interest".

[...] In this new ruling from Miller & Anderson, Inc., the Board returns to a standard set in 2000, during the Clinton administration, in a case called M.B. Sturgis, Inc., which was overruled in Oakwood [Care Center].

[...] In a statement announcing the ruling, the NLRB said, "requiring employer consent to an otherwise appropriate bargaining unit desired by employees, Oakwood has ... allowed employers to shape their ideal bargaining unit, which is precisely the opposite of what Congress intended".

The ruling represents a blow to corporations that have moved forcefully, sometimes overwhelmingly, toward using temporary workers in an effort to block worker benefits and collective bargaining.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by khallow on Friday July 22 2016, @11:08PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday July 22 2016, @11:08PM (#378836) Journal

    The next step would be to disallow unions to financially support any candidate, similar to the Democrats' push against corporate money in politics.

    My view is that labor unions are just a different form of corporation with very similar features and powers. I would treat them equally to corporations.

    I would go so far as to say unions should never be allowed in government, since it gives those workers additional undemocratic representation in our political processes.

    I quite agree and there are analogous corporations, for example, Fannie May and Freddie Mac a couple of particularly notorious examples.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0