Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Sunday July 24 2016, @06:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the guantanamo-bay-tourist-board dept.

After 14 long years languishing at Guantánamo without charge or trial, Mohamedou Slahi has finally been cleared for release.

Slahi was born in Mauritania in 1970 and won a scholarship to attend college in Germany. In the early 1990s, he fought with al-Qaeda when it was part of the Afghan anti-communist resistance supported by the U.S. The federal district court judge who reviewed all the evidence in Slahi's habeas corpus case noted that the group then was very different from the one that later came into existence.

Slahi worked in Germany for several years as an engineer and returned to Mauritania in 2000.

Slahi turned himself in to Mauritanian authorities for questioning about the Millennium Plot on November 20, 2001. He was detained for seven days and questioned by Mauritanian officers and by agents of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).[5] The CIA rendered him to a Jordanian prison, where he was held for eight months. Slahi states that he was tortured by the Jordanians. After being flown to Afghanistan and held for two weeks, he was transferred to military custody and the Guantánamo Bay detention camp in Cuba on August 4, 2002.[6]

Slahi was subjected to isolation, temperature extremes, beatings and sexual humiliation at Guantánamo. In one documented incident, he was blindfolded and taken out to sea in a boat for a mock execution.

https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/mohamedou-ould-slahis-long-nightmare-guantanamo-finally-coming-end

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamedou_Ould_Slahi


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 24 2016, @11:29PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 24 2016, @11:29PM (#379554)

    You don't get people to see a new point of view by insulting them, though as humans that is the hardest thing for us to accomplish :)

    The overwhelming majority (if not all) of Drumpf's supporters are irrational, so they're not going to see any different point of view no matter how nice you are when you smack them around with facts and logic. I can't even imagine the levels of cognitive dissonance in the heads of people who have convinced themselves that electing a fascist thats campaigning on undermining and subverting the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 9th, and 14th amendments is somehow going to "make America great" or promote freedom. If WWII taught us anything, its that willingly giving up all your freedoms, installing a dictator, and scapegoating minorities is exactly how you don't make a country better.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Informative=1, Disagree=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday July 25 2016, @03:47AM

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Monday July 25 2016, @03:47AM (#379640) Journal

    ^ This, this, thiiiiis! I've never been able to put this into words, but AC here nails it. You don't reason with the zombie; you shoot it.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 25 2016, @03:25PM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 25 2016, @03:25PM (#379847) Journal

      No, not "^ This, this, thiiiiis!"

      The majority of voters in BOTH parties are irrational. This election cycle, the conservatives voted for the least irrational offering. Dems tried that, but they were beaten down by the likes of Wasserman-Schultz. The candidates, the parties, the voters, all are equally irrational.

      And, you really are getting to be a blood thirsty little girl. Now you're shooting zombies?

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by Azuma Hazuki on Monday July 25 2016, @03:59PM

        by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Monday July 25 2016, @03:59PM (#379867) Journal

        Fool, I've been "bloodthirsty" since about age 6. Take your patronizing mocking and shove it so far up your sagging, flaccid asshole you gag on it.

        And no, both parties are NOT the same. Once more: the Dems have been Republicans for a couple of decades, and the Republicans have been theocratic whackaloons since the late 70s or early 80s. Quit the false equivalencies; no one with three sparking neurons to rub together is fooled by that odious piece of propaganda.

        --
        I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 25 2016, @04:05PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 25 2016, @04:05PM (#379870)

        The majority of voters in BOTH parties are irrational

        Except this thread is specifically about Trump supporters. See the very first post in this thread? [soylentnews.org] So your bringing in anybody else's supporters is an obvious red herring, completely unrelated to this discussion.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 25 2016, @06:08PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 25 2016, @06:08PM (#379952)

        This election cycle, the conservatives voted for the least irrational offering.

        THEY DID?!? Um, you do realize that the Republicans have put forward Trump as their standard-bearer this election season, right? Do you really think he is the least irrational offering? The man is, quite literally, the text book definition of irrational. I am sure that future generations will do case studies on his irrational outbursts. In fact, it is hard to find anyone I would consider "rational" amongst the Republican conservatives this election cycle. Seriously. And, before you jump to conclusions, no, I'm not an ultra-liberal socialist commie. In fact, I'm a conservative, evangelical. I was chased out of the Republican party several years back. For the first time in my life I will probably be voting third party.

        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 25 2016, @10:51PM

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 25 2016, @10:51PM (#380090) Journal

          Well, yes, I do think that Trump is the least irrational of the choices offered. Who does he belong to? Who did all the others belong to? Carson was a wild card, I don't know who he belongs to, but all the rest belong to Wall Street and Corporate America. And, where are Wall Street, Corporate America, and Hillary Clinton all looking for their next war?

          Trump is the candidate least likely to start a new war. That seems pretty damned rational to me.