Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Monday July 25 2016, @06:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the all-good-thigns-must-come-to-an-end dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

After more than 50 years of miniaturization, the transistor could stop shrinking in just five years. That is the prediction of the 2015 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, which was officially released earlier this month.

After 2021, the report forecasts, it will no longer be economically desirable for companies to continue to shrink the dimensions of transistors in microprocessors. Instead, chip manufacturers will turn to other means of boosting density, namely turning the transistor from a horizontal to a vertical geometry and building multiple layers of circuitry, one on top of another.

For some, this change will likely be interpreted as another death knell for Moore's Law, the repeated doubling of transistor densities that has given us the extraordinarily capable computers we have today. Compounding the drama is the fact that this is the last ITRS roadmap, the end to a more-than-20-year-old coordinated planning effort that began in the United States and was then expanded to include the rest of the world.

[...]

This final ITRS report is titled ITRS 2.0. The name reflects the idea that improvements in computing are no longer driven from the bottom-up, by tinier switches and denser or faster memories. Instead, it takes a more top-down approach, focusing on the applications that now drive chip design, such as data centers, the Internet of Things, and mobile gadgets.

Source: http://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/hardware/transistors-will-stop-shrinking-in-2021-moores-law-roadmap-predicts


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Tuesday July 26 2016, @10:27AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday July 26 2016, @10:27AM (#380247) Journal

    Stacking separate chips does help with yields, reducing costs, but the stacking process isn't cheap yet, so it make sense for expensive stuff.

    The other reason for stacking is that it makes it easy to combine different technologies. Most mobile devices have LPDDR stacked on top of the SoC die. It wouldn't make sense to put them on the same die, because the technology used to manufacture DRAM is very different to that used to manufacture processors (something that is causing issues for people like IBM and HP, who want to move some compute closer to the DRAM).

    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday July 26 2016, @04:24PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday July 26 2016, @04:24PM (#380342)

    The problem with "different" techs is that they have to be similar enough to be stacked. Thru-Silicon Vias are tiny, so you don't want any difference in thermal expansion between the layers