Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday July 26 2016, @01:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the what's-that-wooshing-sound? dept.

While scanning through items in our #rss-bot channel for today, I came upon an interesting article at phys.org CP violation or new physics?:

Over the past few years, multiple neutrino experiments have detected hints for leptonic charge parity (CP) violation—a finding that could help explain why the universe is made of matter and not antimatter. So far, matter-antimatter asymmetry cannot be explained by any physics theory and is one of the biggest unsolved problems in cosmology.

But now in a new study published in Physical Review Letters, physicists David V. Forero and Patrick Huber at Virginia Tech have proposed that the same hints could instead indicate CP-conserving "new physics," and current experiments would have no way to tell the difference.

Both possibilities—CP violation or new physics—would have a major impact on the scientific understanding of some of the biggest questions in cosmology. Currently, one of the most pressing problems is the search for new physics, or physics beyond the Standard Model, which is a theory that scientists know is incomplete but aren't sure exactly how to improve. New physics could potentially explain several phenomena that the Standard Model cannot, including the matter-antimatter asymmetry problem, as well as dark matter, dark energy, and gravity.

As the scientists show in the new study, determining whether the recent hints indicate CP violation or new physics will be very challenging. The main goal of the study was to "quantify the level of confusion" between the two possibilities. The physicists' simulations and analysis revealed that both CP violation and new physics have distributions centered at the exact same value for what the neutrino experiments measure—something called the Dirac CP phase. This identical preference makes it impossible for current neutrino experiments to distinguish between the two cases.

[...] "The trick is that the type of new physics we postulate in our paper manifests itself in the way in which neutrino oscillations are affected by the amount of earth matter through which the neutrino traverses," Huber said. "The more matter travelled through, the larger the effect of this type of new physics."

An abstract (DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.031801 ) is available; full article is paywalled.

This is way outside my level of understanding, but I have seen references to CP violations before and find the concept fascinating Any Soylentils care to weigh in and explain what was found and what it may mean in terms that an educated but non-physicist layman might understand?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 26 2016, @04:30AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 26 2016, @04:30AM (#380185)

    If we put the two together and assume that matter and antimatter were made in equal proportions by the mechanics of the Big Bang, then we get a picture of a similar "mirror" to our own universe made of antimatter that shares our own Big Bang but with its arrow of time pointing in the opposite direction.

    But from the perspective of a sentient being within this "mirror universe" (i assume they all have goatees), time would appear to be running forward, the same as it does here, so such a thought exercise doesn't really go anywhere, except maybe in establishing that we only have a single parallel universe, the antimatter universe (which we could thus never visit or interact with), rather than an infinite number of them; this would explain where all the antimatter went though.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 26 2016, @05:20AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 26 2016, @05:20AM (#380194)

    No, as I understand it the two interact all the time, because of the behavior of photons and virtual particles, and possibly the behavior of information around the singularity of a black hole. But that is to say, I don't understand it :P

  • (Score: 2) by TrumpetPower! on Tuesday July 26 2016, @01:52PM

    by TrumpetPower! (590) <ben@trumpetpower.com> on Tuesday July 26 2016, @01:52PM (#380288) Homepage

    That's basically right, though it wouldn't say anything about multiverses -- only that universes come in pairs of matter and antimatter. Maybe our is the only such pair; maybe there're innumerable such pairs; maybe only some have laws of physics that include antimatter; and maybe (much more likely) I'm nowhere near qualified to be speculating on the matter....

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Tuesday July 26 2016, @05:14PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Tuesday July 26 2016, @05:14PM (#380362)

      I'm even less qualified than you, because I don't understand how the gravity-driven collapse of all matter into a single point, which is then followed by a Big Bang spreading it again (rinse-repeat), should result into equal quantities of matter and anti-matter...

    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 26 2016, @06:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 26 2016, @06:22PM (#380392)

      "I'm nowhere near qualified to be speculating on the matter...."

      But are you qualified to be speculating on the antimatter?