Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday July 28 2016, @03:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the it-had-a-good-run dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Everything about the Rosetta comet mission has been epic. It took 10 years for the spacecraft to reach Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, which it did in 2014. Rosetta then sent its plucky little lander Philae down to the comet's surface, but a faulty thruster landed it in shadows. Unable to charge itself properly, Philae floated in and out of contact. The Rosetta team last heard from Philae way back in July 2015. It's been silent ever since.

[...] Rosetta is scheduled to wrap up its mission by descending to the comet's surface on September 30. The comet is currently heading away from the sun, which saps the spacecraft of the solar power it needs to continue operations. There is a sense of poetry to Rosetta rejoining its lander on the comet. It may mark the end of Rosetta's activities, but scientists involved in the mission will stay busy for years studying the data sent back by both the craft and the lander.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Thursday July 28 2016, @09:17PM

    by butthurt (6141) on Thursday July 28 2016, @09:17PM (#381329) Journal

    It really is. The Outer Space Treaty prohibits nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction in space. The reason RTGs are heavy is the thick casing around the radioisotope. Without that casing, you've essentially got a dirty bomb. Because of irrational fears over inhaling/ingesting plutonium-238 or strontium-90, all spacecraft save for a few such as New Horizons [ecnmag.com] use unreliable solar panels. The Philae failure was that it bounced off the comet a few times, then landed in shadows. Had it had an RTG, there would have been no problem.

    On Earth, the Soviet Union deployed perhaps around a thousand [eu.com] RTGs (we don't really know how many, or where they all are) for uses such as lighthouses. In spite of thieves [unc.edu] and storms [barentsobserver.com], most of the ones that haven't been replaced [nti.org] with solar–battery systems are still intact, so far as we know.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @08:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @08:42AM (#381454)

    "...deployed perhaps around a thousand RTGs (we don't really know how many, or where they all are) ... still intact, so far as we know."

    And you think silly politics is the only reason people don't want an unknown number of dirty bombs deployed at untracked, unsecured locations around the globe?