Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday July 29 2016, @04:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the opportunists dept.

The crime rate, especially drug crime, decreases significantly when more 16-44 year olds have access to affordable Vocational Education and Training, (VET) according to a new University of Melbourne report.

Drug crime rate decreased 13 per cent when more people had access to a publicly-funded place in VET. The research also recorded a five percent and 11 per cent decrease in personal and property crime respectively, including assault, theft and burglary.

Report author, Dr Cain Polidano from the Melbourne Institute found that the extra public funding of VET (TAFE and private colleges) reduced the costs of crime.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @05:21AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @05:21AM (#381433)

    what happens when votech withers with the lack of employment opportunities.

    Duh. Some fool writes a report entitled Basic Income Reduces Crime.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @05:25AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @05:25AM (#381436)

    Counterpoint-

    Areas with a high population of welfare recipients also tend to be high crime areas.

    Not that I'm opposed to basic income necessarily, but having the entire nation on the plantation might not work out as well as anticipated.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @05:30AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @05:30AM (#381439)

      Entire nation on the plantation is exactly where we're headed if the 1%ers want to continue hoarding money and still keep their heads.

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by TheRaven on Friday July 29 2016, @09:27AM

      by TheRaven (270) on Friday July 29 2016, @09:27AM (#381460) Journal

      Universal basic income doesn't mean that you won't work, it just means that you'll have a stronger bargaining position with potential employers. If you don't need the job to live then you can walk away if the conditions are too bad, but if they're okay then the extra income still increases your quality of life.

      One of the big problems with a lot of current welfare implementations is that going from not working at all to working a little bit can decrease your net income. UBI has the big advantage that if you always make more money by working than by not working, no matter how little you work. You also always make more money by working more than by working less (though with a progressive tax system, the marginal increase may be lower as you work more).

      --
      sudo mod me up
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @09:59AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @09:59AM (#381467)

        All of that is splendid and has absolutely nothing to do with the point- areas of increased welfare (i.e.- lack of job opportunities) typically have higher rates of crime.

        If there is no work, basic income means squat towards the crime rate.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @10:14AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @10:14AM (#381469)

          If you are getting a basic income, it makes it much easier to move to a better place where they may be jobs.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @01:36PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @01:36PM (#381524)

          And that's splendid but fails to account for every UBI trial ever done.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @11:08AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 29 2016, @11:08AM (#381486)

        The proposed Switzerland basic income was over $2,500 a month per adult. Even accounting for higher cost of living, that is massive.

        Many in the US can live comfortably on $800-1k a month and never work again. For extra money to spend on luxuries, committing opportunistic crimes once in a while such as mugging Pokemon Gotards is far easier than holding a job. If your crimes catch up to you, all your basic needs including health care are met in prison.

        You can also afford to be your own pimp and sell sex services with relative safety. To be fair, that can be called a job, but you don't even have to leave your government paid-for rented home or get off the bed to be a camwhore. Finally, the best manipulators will get clients to pay to watch them eat, or pay for the thrill of being financially dominated. That's right, there are men who pay "fin doms" to take their money and get almost nothing in return except maybe verbal abuse.

        The future is universal basic income, total unemployment, VR games, and absolute surveillance. Not so bad right?