Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday July 30 2016, @05:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the old-tech-phased-out dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Six months after slicing production of the iconic Boeing 747 to just one plane a month, the aerospace company has decided to halve the rate of production and flagged it is close to killing off the plane.

A new Form 10-Q filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission spells out the ugly situation as “Lower-than-expected demand for large commercial passenger and freighter aircraft and slower-than-expected growth of global freight traffic have continued to drive market uncertainties, pricing pressures and fewer orders than anticipated.”

Boeing has therefore “canceled previous plans to return to a production rate of 1.0 aircraft per month beginning in 2019.”

The company still has “32 undelivered aircraft” on its books, some yet to be built. But it also has “a number of completed aircraft in inventory” for which buyers cannot be found.

Production of the 747 will therefore been reduced just six planes a year as of September 2016 and the filing makes it plain that Boeing knows it may soon have a difficult decision to make.

“If we are unable to obtain sufficient orders and/or market, production and other risks cannot be mitigated,” the filing says, “we could record additional losses that may be material, and it is reasonably possible that we could decide to end production of the 747.”

The 747 remains a fine aircraft, but twin-engine planes can now match it for capacity and, crucially, for long flights over areas where airports are scarce.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by requerdanos on Saturday July 30 2016, @10:28PM

    by requerdanos (5997) Subscriber Badge on Saturday July 30 2016, @10:28PM (#382082) Journal

    Production of the 747 will therefore been reduced just six planes a year

    There are words missing here (in? from?) the original that would make this a proper sentence (or independent clause, as the case may be). Is production reduced only by six, to a current level of x - 6, x being a previous production level, as this phrase says? Or to (x - x) + 6, as the previous copy contradictorily indicates? They can't both be right.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Sunday July 31 2016, @03:38AM

    by butthurt (6141) on Sunday July 31 2016, @03:38AM (#382154) Journal

    /blockquote>Production cut, again, to just six a year as completed planes await buyers

    Six months after slicing production of the iconic Boeing 747 to just one plane a month, the aerospace company has decided to halve the rate of production and flagged it is close to killing off the plane.

    begins the article. Here's a link to it in Google's cache:

    https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/29/747_grounded/ [googleusercontent.com]

    and on archive.is:
    https://archive.is/5nVJp [archive.is]