Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday August 01 2016, @06:42PM   Printer-friendly
from the am-I-going-to-regret-releasing-this? dept.

EurekAlert have just published an article: Yale researchers shed light on evolutionary mystery: Origins of the female orgasm

The role of female orgasm, which plays no obvious role in human reproduction, has intrigued scholars as far back as Aristotle. Numerous theories have tried to explain the origins of the trait, but most have concentrated on its role in human and primate biology.

[...] Since there is no apparent association between orgasm and number of offspring or successful reproduction in humans, the scientists focused on a specific physiological trait that accompanies human female orgasm -- the neuro-endocrine discharge of prolactin and oxytocin -- and looked for this activity in other placental mammals. They found that in many mammals this reflex plays a role in ovulation.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by Jeremiah Cornelius on Monday August 01 2016, @06:57PM

    by Jeremiah Cornelius (2785) on Monday August 01 2016, @06:57PM (#382746) Journal

    It played a BLOODY OBVIOUS ROLE, in the reproduction resulting in the birth of MY children, I give you that!

    Of course, with respect to the published literature, this is purely anecdotal.

    --
    You're betting on the pantomime horse...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Funny=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by frojack on Monday August 01 2016, @07:28PM

    by frojack (1554) on Monday August 01 2016, @07:28PM (#382770) Journal

    Exactly/
    Why else would she ever do it again?

    Nature has its ways of rewarding what is good for the species. We avoid shit but are attracted to food. So we shit away from others and eating is a social event.

    Lush lands produce more food and support more people. So humans enjoy the beauty of lush countryside landscapes and find deserts boring.

    It goes on and on?

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by mendax on Monday August 01 2016, @07:34PM

      by mendax (2840) on Monday August 01 2016, @07:34PM (#382775)

      So humans enjoy the beauty of lush countryside landscapes and find deserts boring.

      Speak for yourself. I prefer the stark beauty of the desert. Death Valley is my favorite place on earth, well 8 months out of the year. I'm not going to endure another 125F (52C) day there again.

      --
      It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
      • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Monday August 01 2016, @10:39PM

        by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Monday August 01 2016, @10:39PM (#382868) Homepage
        I'm flipside. Can't live much further south than 60oN. Would rather have snowblindness than direct sun. My Brazilian friends piss themselves with laughter when 25C is a "heatwave".

        But back on topic, the summary's retarded. The article's probably retarded too. Evolutionarily, our bodies still think we need to drop up to a dozen sprogs, we've not had a time to adapt to modern things like germ theory and hand-washing. Not gonna happen without some incentive.
        --
        Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 2) by frojack on Monday August 01 2016, @10:50PM

        by frojack (1554) on Monday August 01 2016, @10:50PM (#382872) Journal

        I knew someone would chirp in with that, but the point is you eat what came from elsewhere.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
      • (Score: 2) by Jeremiah Cornelius on Monday August 01 2016, @11:17PM

        by Jeremiah Cornelius (2785) on Monday August 01 2016, @11:17PM (#382876) Journal

        I think the pinnacle of human evolution and social development has been making the entire conception "out-of-doors" as something one may dismiss from daily life.

        --
        You're betting on the pantomime horse...
      • (Score: 2) by art guerrilla on Tuesday August 02 2016, @11:18AM

        by art guerrilla (3082) on Tuesday August 02 2016, @11:18AM (#383056)

        um, so you don't recognize you are an outlier, or refuse to accept it ? ? ?
        *most* of us prefer the lushness compared to the desiccated landscape...
        while the desert is certainly 'alive', it ain't got nowhere near the amount of edible plants and critters a savanna/forest type environment has...
        only so many ants and horn frogs you can scare up in the sand (not to mention derive water from), then you die...