Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 01 2016, @08:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the unintended-consequences dept.

The early release of a variety of soybeans resistant to the herbicide dicamba has led to criminal spraying and the death of normal soybean crops:

Dicamba has been around for decades, and it is notorious for a couple of things: It vaporizes quickly and blows with the wind. And it's especially toxic to soybeans, even at ridiculously low concentrations. Damage from drifting pesticides isn't unfamiliar to farmers. But the reason for this year's plague of dicamba damage is unprecedented. "I've never seen anything like this before," says Bob Scott, a weed specialist from the University of Arkansas. "This is a unique situation that Monsanto created."

The story starts with Monsanto because the St. Louis-based biotech giant launched, this year, an updated version of its herbicide-tolerant soybean seeds. This new version, which Monsanto calls "Xtend," isn't just engineered to tolerate sprays of glyphosate, aka Roundup. It's also immune to dicamba.

Monsanto created dicamba-resistant soybeans (and cotton) in an effort to stay a step ahead of the weeds. The strategy of planting Roundup-resistant crops and spraying Roundup to kill weeds isn't working so well anymore, because weeds have evolved resistance to glyphosate. Adding genes for dicamba resistance, so the thinking went, would give farmers the option of spraying dicamba as well, which would clear out the weeds that survive glyphosate. There was just one hitch in the plan. A very big hitch, as it turned out. The Environmental Protection Agency has not yet approved the new dicamba weedkiller that Monsanto created for farmers to spray on its new dicamba-resistant crops. That new formulation of dicamba, according to Monsanto, has been formulated so that it won't vaporize as easily, and won't be as likely to harm neighboring crops. If the EPA approves the new weedkiller, it may impose restrictions on how and when the chemical may be used.

But, Monsanto went ahead and started selling its dicamba-resistant soybeans before this herbicide was approved. It gave farmers a new weed-killing tool that they couldn't legally use.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Gaaark on Monday August 01 2016, @08:59PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Monday August 01 2016, @08:59PM (#382823) Journal

    I almost had time to submit this, but then didn't. Glad someone did.

    Monsanto needs to die, die, die.
    It needs to go to war and be shoved up someone's butt.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by Francis on Monday August 01 2016, @09:13PM

    by Francis (5544) on Monday August 01 2016, @09:13PM (#382828)

    Up someone's butt? Monsanto is a corporation, not a watch.

  • (Score: 2) by jimshatt on Monday August 01 2016, @09:50PM

    by jimshatt (978) on Monday August 01 2016, @09:50PM (#382849) Journal
    I think it's already at war. The public is becoming aware of Monsato's practices and are choosing other products. Under pressure Monsato is likely to use more and more aggressive tactics. It'll go down in the end, but not without a fight.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 01 2016, @11:59PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 01 2016, @11:59PM (#382887)

    Monsanto needs to die, die, die.

    I agree, but not for this situation. The farmers who sprayed dicamba, against the law, are responsible for their own actions.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Tuesday August 02 2016, @01:15AM

      by fido_dogstoyevsky (131) <axehandleNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Tuesday August 02 2016, @01:15AM (#382919)

      Monsanto needs to die, die, die.

      I agree, but not for this situation. The farmers who sprayed dicamba, against the law, are responsible for their own actions.

      But... but they were just following orders.*

        

         

      *That is, the farmers need to penalised for illegally using pesticides, but monsanto REALLY needs to die (they make microsoft look ethical).

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.