Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Tuesday August 02 2016, @01:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the 640k dept.

SK Hynix will begin mass production of 4 GB HBM2 memory stacks soon:

SK Hynix has quietly added its HBM Gen 2 memory stacks to its public product catalog earlier this month, which means that the start of mass production should be imminent. The company will first offer two types of new memory modules with the same capacity, but different transfer-rates, targeting graphics cards, HPC accelerators and other applications. Over time, the HBM2 family will get broader.

SK Hynix intends to initially offer its clients 4 GB HBM2 4Hi stack KGSDs (known good stack dies) based on 8 Gb DRAM devices. The memory devices will feature a 1024-bit bus as well as 1.6 GT/s (H5VR32ESM4H-12C) and 2.0 GT/s (H5VR32ESM4H-20C) data-rates, thus offering 204 GB/s and 256 GB/s peak bandwidth per stack.

Samsung has already manufactured 4 GB stacks. Eventually, there will also be 2 GB and 8 GB stacks available.

Previously: AMD Shares More Details on High Bandwidth Memory
Samsung Announces Mass Production of HBM2 DRAM


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Tuesday August 02 2016, @01:29PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 02 2016, @01:29PM (#383117)

    If you are looking for a game to melt your computer, try Doom (the new one). My R9 290 and higher-end A-10 can't get above 15 FPS. The game looks like a lot of fun though. Might even have a story-line?

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Wednesday August 03 2016, @07:50AM

    by Hairyfeet (75) <bassbeast1968NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Wednesday August 03 2016, @07:50AM (#383526) Journal

    I don't really play FPS games much anymore, I find them kinda boring actually. Maybe because I'm getting older but I prefer games like War Thunder where I can fly all the great planes of WWII and loop and zoom and watch fighters burn like fireballs in the sky and drive all the rare tanks like the Nb:Fz and SMK and turn battlefields into black smoking fields of death using nothing but a primitive gunsight and knowledge of physics to calculate shell drop on the fly.

    If you haven't tried it you ought to give it a go, if you can kick some ass they have events where you can win vehicles that will never be offered for sale or be in the tech tree ever. About another week I'll have this sweet baby [warthunder.com] added to my hangar, it'll go nicely with my Wirraway in low tier fun as hell fighter bombers.

    But I bet your bottleneck is the A-10, they are really made more for HTPCs than gaming rigs. I have the FX-8320E which hits 4.1Ghz without OCing and I can easily hit 4.5-4.6Ghz on air so I seriously doubt my CPU would be a bottleneck. If you keep an eye out you can grab an FX-8xxx chip for around $100 and IMHO its money well spent, when you don't need the extra horses it downclocks to 1.4Ghz and with 8 cores it'll pretty much stay there for most day to day task but when you DO need the extra power? They'll kick it up quite nicely.

    --
    ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
    • (Score: 2) by tibman on Wednesday August 03 2016, @01:45PM

      by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 03 2016, @01:45PM (#383586)

      I think you're right with the CPU bottleneck. It wasn't originally going to be a gaming machine, just a small programming machine. Really wanted to go AM3+ for FX but couldn't find a mini-itx motherboard. Had to go FM2 : / Saving up money for the Zen release later this year (please don't delay!).

      That certainly is a strange plane, hah. I imagine the lesser known vehicles rarely get included in any game. If you are also into WW1 vehicles then Battlefield 1 might be something you'll be interested in: https://www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1/vehicles [battlefield.com]

      --
      SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
      • (Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Thursday August 04 2016, @12:46AM

        by Hairyfeet (75) <bassbeast1968NO@SPAMgmail.com> on Thursday August 04 2016, @12:46AM (#383849) Journal

        The problem with the BF series is it really is just a FPS with vehicles added as an afterthought. If its anything like previous games the physics are REALLY arcade like, with the ability to pull shit that the real life planes would never be able to pull off in a million years.

        I prefer my fights more realistic, nothing like using a B-25 like a flying battleship, trading blows with a FW190 or A6M3, and then while the fighter becomes a flaming wreck nursing your damaged bomber back to the base like something out of Memphis Belle. I have managed to bring a P-38 back to base from 12k away on one dying engine by nursing the throttle and figuring up a glide path on the fly, got my B-25 home with the tail controls completely shot and half the crew dead, and even managed to hold a cap zone for more than 10 minutes against the entire enemy column using an M3 Lee that had a blown track and no engine like something out of Fury, it was fucking amazing.

        I've tried Rise Of Flight and War Thunder has some pre war biplanes so I've had some time behind the stick of those early planes....they are just not for me. This is how I know Battlefield will be arcade as hell because IRL those early planes? The guns were absolute SHIT, we're talking weaker than your average rifle round, prone to jamming, you had to practically kiss the enemy to get a kill and if you didn't hit the pilot or the engine you could give it up, those old canvas birds could be shot all to hell and keep on flying.

        Nope for me 37-45 is the sweet spot for planes and tanks, hell I have a half a dozen jets in my hangar and never take 'em out because I find too much speed just as boring as too little. Plus I have a soft spot in my heart for crazy derpy shit and WWII was like a mad scientist lab of insane-o vehicles, from double barrel tanks like Nb:Fz and SMK to monsters like KV-2 and StuH-42 and from the most agile of planes like the A6M and Spitfire to the USSR and Germany and their "hey lets see how much of a BFG we can jam into a plane!" like the 37mm in the Yak-3P and IL2 to the bomber killers like the 45mm Yak-9K and the BF109 Gs with 30mm gunpods filled with Minegeschoss which were like throwing hand grenades.

          Its just too fun to play around with all these vehicles for me to want to jump into an MMO FPS with arcade gameplay when I'm used to flying realistic and simulation, thanks anyway.

        --
        ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.